Re: Freeze stuff, summary.. (perl 5.005, etc)

1999-05-11 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Oscar Levi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've been distracted by revenue production for a couple of months. > > Are we expected to upload our packages rebuilt for glibc2.1? > > It wouldn't hurt but I don't think it's necessary. glibc2.1 can > drop-in replace 2.0 (unl

Re: Freeze stuff, summary.. (perl 5.005, etc)

1999-05-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Adam> It wouldn't hurt but I don't think it's necessary. glibc2.1 can Adam> drop-in replace 2.0 (unless you have a program that depends on Adam> certain internal stuff which it shouldn't be using anyway). Octave doesn't depend on internal stuff, but still fails when a glibc2.0 compiled ver

Re: Freeze stuff, summary.. (perl 5.005, etc)

1999-05-10 Thread Joseph Carter
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 02:11:42AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > I've been distracted by revenue production for a couple of months. > > Are we expected to upload our packages rebuilt for glibc2.1? > > It wouldn't hurt but I don't think it's necessary. glibc2.1 can > drop-in replace 2.0 (unless

Re: Freeze stuff, summary.. (perl 5.005, etc)

1999-05-10 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Oscar Levi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've been distracted by revenue production for a couple of months. > Are we expected to upload our packages rebuilt for glibc2.1? It wouldn't hurt but I don't think it's necessary. glibc2.1 can drop-in replace 2.0 (unless you have a program that depends o

Re: Freeze stuff, summary.. (perl 5.005, etc)

1999-05-10 Thread Oscar Levi
I've been distracted by revenue production for a couple of months. Are we expected to upload our packages rebuilt for glibc2.1?