Re: Essential [Re: Switching /bin/sh to dash (part two)]

2009-07-22 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-07-22 18:06 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: > mawk is alway installed (required and a dependency of an essential package). Wrong, you can easily remove mawk if you like, as long as you have another package that provides awk: , | % LANG=C aptitude -s remove mawk | Reading package l

Re: Essential [Re: Switching /bin/sh to dash (part two)]

2009-07-22 Thread Russ Allbery
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" writes: > Russ Allbery wrote: >> awk is essential. Specific awk implementations are not, but the >> interface is essential. This is something that we've discussed many >> times over the years and I'm absolutely certain that statement is >> correct. > awk is a virtual pac

Re: Essential [Re: Switching /bin/sh to dash (part two)]

2009-07-22 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Russ Allbery wrote: "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" writes: Russ Allbery wrote: libc is essential from a Policy perspective. It's just not marked that way in the packaging system in case the SONAME changes, but it's essential in the same way that awk is. Note that dependencies on awk are not requir

Re: Essential [Re: Switching /bin/sh to dash (part two)]

2009-07-22 Thread Russ Allbery
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" writes: > Russ Allbery wrote: >> libc is essential from a Policy perspective. It's just not marked that >> way in the packaging system in case the SONAME changes, but it's >> essential in the same way that awk is. Note that dependencies on awk >> are not required (and ind