Re: Error when running dh_dwz (actually an error when running dwz(1))

2022-08-07 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 7:53 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:28 PM Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > On 09.07.19 21:54, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > > Dear -devel list, > > > > > > Looks like dh_dwz was recently added into debhelper and it is causing some > > > FTBFS on one of

Re: Error when running dh_dwz (actually an error when running dwz(1))

2022-08-07 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Hi, On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:28 PM Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 09.07.19 21:54, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > Dear -devel list, > > > > Looks like dh_dwz was recently added into debhelper and it is causing some > > FTBFS on one of my packages. It could be a bug of dwz itself but I'm looking > > for som

Re: Error when running dh_dwz (actually an error when running dwz(1))

2019-07-10 Thread Matthias Klose
On 09.07.19 21:54, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Dear -devel list, > > Looks like dh_dwz was recently added into debhelper and it is causing some > FTBFS on one of my packages. It could be a bug of dwz itself but I'm looking > for some help inside Debian first. > > Please try to build package marisa from

Re: Error when running dh_dwz (actually an error when running dwz(1))

2019-07-09 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Boyuan, > I don't have much experience of dealing with debugging symbols so any hints > would be appreciated. I would also be interested in this from my "Lintian hat" of: https://bugs.debian.org/931632#35 Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@deb

Re: error messages of failing maintainer scripts

2019-05-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Ralf Treinen writes ("error messages of failing maintainer scripts"): > do we require that a maintainer script that exits with an error gives > a useful error message? I couldn't find anything about this in policy, > but I think that we should require, or at least recommend, useful error > messages

Re: Error in the Debian Social Contract

2014-05-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Solal writes: > The "Artistic" link go to the Perl license text. > The Artistic License isn't a free license (non-defined definitions such > as "C or Perl subroutines" make it invalid and potentially proprietary, > FSF is right when they says "is too vague for talk about free"). The Artistic lic

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-23 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Heya, >> You can easily run into this problem by using >> make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot modules-image >> and the nvidia module will fail with > > Does this happen every time? with the nvidia module - yes [1]. I'm pretty sure I've seen this happen with {svn,dpkg}-buildpackage before, too - but I j

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-22 Thread Clint Adams
> I doubt that. > You can easily run into this problem by using > make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot modules-image > and the nvidia module will fail with Does this happen every time? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-20 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Heya, > > Maybe the original poster may have typed in "fakeroot" by itself > without realizing it changed the environment. I doubt that. You can easily run into this problem by using make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot modules-image and the nvidia module will fail with fakeroot: FAKEROOTKEY set to 162

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-20 Thread Clint Adams
> Not sure why on earth you would want to do this, but it seems to work > OK on etch. Maybe this is only supported with recent versions of > fakeroot? No, it's only appearing to work OK. You'll lose state between the different fakeroot invocations and that's why the error message is there until w

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-19 Thread Brian May
> "Clint" == Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I created one package. When I try to perform the below command, >> come this error: >> >> pc101:# fakeroot debian/rules binary fakeroot: FAKEROOTKEY set >> to 818929733 fakeroot: nested operation not yet supporte

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-19 Thread Rodrigo Faria Tavares
Hello, I don't know. I want to execute the fakeroot with success best regards, Faria - Original Message - From: "Clint Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rodrigo Tavares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 10:53 AM Subject

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-19 Thread Clint Adams
> Hi, > > The command: > > pc01:package/fakeroot debian/rules > fakeroot: FAKEROOTKEY set to 818929733 > fakeroot: nested operation not yet supported > > Att, > > Faria Let's try this another way. Why is FAKEROOTKEY already set? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-19 Thread Rodrigo Tavares
Hi, The command: pc01:package/fakeroot debian/rules fakeroot: FAKEROOTKEY set to 818929733 fakeroot: nested operation not yet supported Att, Faria --- Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > I created one package. When I try to perform the > below > > command, come this error: > > >

Re: Error with fakeroot

2007-04-19 Thread Clint Adams
> I created one package. When I try to perform the below > command, come this error: > > pc101:# fakeroot debian/rules binary > fakeroot: FAKEROOTKEY set to 818929733 > fakeroot: nested operation not yet supporte > > Any suggestion ? Are you trying to run fakeroot within fakeroot? -- To UNSU

Re: Error with dh_gencontrol

2006-09-19 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Em Ter, 2006-09-19 às 13:30 +, Rodrigo Tavares escreveu: > I add the fisrt line the field : > > Source : missing > > But the error continue the same. It's not only the Source: field, it's the whole stanza, like Wouter said. Again, pretty please, read the Debian New Maintainer's Guide and ***

Re: Error with dh_gencontrol

2006-09-19 Thread Rodrigo Tavares
Hello, I add the fisrt line the field : Source : missing But the error continue the same. Thanks Faria --- Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > This is really a question for -mentors, rather than > -devel. Cc set, > please send follow-ups (if any) only there. > > On Tue, Sep 19

Re: Error with dh_gencontrol

2006-09-19 Thread Wouter Verhelst
This is really a question for -mentors, rather than -devel. Cc set, please send follow-ups (if any) only there. On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:19:04PM +, Rodrigo Tavares wrote: > Hello, > > When I run the command below, come this error message: > > > mypc:~/script-1.4# dh_gencontrol > dh_gencon

Re: error

2006-09-10 Thread secretariat
(write WSEAS in the Subject, when you reply) Dear Colleague, We will reply you soon IF AND ONLY IF you have included the word WSEAS in the Subject of your email. If you do not understand what to do, simply, visit the link: http://www.worldses.org/contact_us.htm and click on the link of email F

Re: Error

2005-03-16 Thread smms
лл£¡ÊÕµ½£¡ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Error processing gconf2 (2.2.1-2)

2003-09-04 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:04:18AM +0200, Jos Lemmerling wrote: > Hi all, > > there is a small typo in the gconf2.postinst script; add a space > between the braces and the backslash in the find-line. It was fixed yesterday shortly after dinstall. Try again today. -- Joshua Kwan pgpJeoYT7f74c.

Re: Error processing gconf2 (2.2.1-2)

2003-09-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:04:18AM +0200, Jos Lemmerling wrote: > Hi all, > > there is a small typo in the gconf2.postinst script; add a space > between the braces and the backslash in the find-line. Please see: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting (Also, this has been reported as bugs #20860

Re: Error in upgrading libgd-perl?

2003-05-22 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
This is a consequence of its broken build-depends (Bug #193602). -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.

Re: Error

2001-09-11 Thread Jason Thomas
you need to send an unsubscribe message to the following addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 11:22:57AM -0300, Acosta-Gamez wrote: > Please: > This is not a PC support address. Please remove my direction from your list. > Regards. > [

Re: Error upgrading to woody: mv: cannot create file `/etc/exim/exim.conf'

2001-09-04 Thread Colin Watson
(Mail-Followup-To: set to -user only. I'd also appreciate not being directly cc'ed on your questions; I read both -user and -devel, so I got three copies of this!) On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:01:56PM -0700, tluxt wrote: > In fact, the directory: > /etc/exim > does not exist. You can create it your

Re: Error upgrading to woody: mv: cannot create file `/etc/exim/exim.conf'

2001-09-04 Thread Christian Marillat
"LdS" == Laurent de Segur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, Hi, > Actually, from stable to testing, I got a blocker with gnome-help package. > The install wouldn't let me go any further and I had to remove this > particular package from the selection just to be able to finish it up. The

Re: Error upgrading to woody: mv: cannot create file `/etc/exim/exim.conf'

2001-09-04 Thread Laurent de Segur
Hi all, Actually, from stable to testing, I got a blocker with gnome-help package. The install wouldn't let me go any further and I had to remove this particular package from the selection just to be able to finish it up. Then later on, I installed it individually with no problem. The error was th