[Silvio Cesare]
> I created an automatically generated CPE list for Fedora13
> packages. It only has 300 or so packages in it, but this will
> improve as say Debian increase the list of packages they track (they
> only track 1100 or so currently).
>
> https://github.com/silviocesare/Equivalent-Pac
I created an automatically generated CPE list for Fedora13 packages. It only
has 300 or so packages in it, but this will improve as say Debian increase
the list of packages they track (they only track 1100 or so currently).
https://github.com/silviocesare/Equivalent-Packages/blob/master/CPE/Fedora
[Raphael Geissert]
> It would be great if anyone could make any progress on that.
Yeah.
> Some time ago it was mentioned as a possible way to automate the
> processing of new CVE ids (i.e. when MITRE publishes the description
> and other info) and to detect incorrect Not-For-Us entries in the
> s
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[...]
> It would be great if you or someone else could provide a mapping from
> distribution packages to CPE entries. :)
It would be great if anyone could make any progress on that.
Some time ago it was mentioned as a possible way to automate the processing
of new CVE
[Silvio Cesare]
> Do you think such a list could be useful to Debian? A possible use
> would be that a user could identify an equivalent package knowing
> only Fedora's package name.
I've been looking into a similar task the last few days, to try to
track security issues in multiple distributions
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:53:07PM +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> I'm the developer of Listaller, a cross-distro software installer/manager
> and therefore also interested in this topic, as it is one of the major
> technical problems which are currently not solved very well :)
> Unfortunately I c
Hi there!
I'm the developer of Listaller, a cross-distro software installer/manager
and therefore also interested in this topic, as it is one of the major
technical problems which are currently not solved very well :)
Unfortunately I couldn't attend the AppInstaller meeting. (I wanted to,
but could
Hi, Thanks for the response and interest.
I should note the package names I have listed in the dataset are source
package names, not binary package names.
The method I am using is based on similarity between filename lists of
source packages. I use the Jaccard index (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:54:44AM +1100, Silvio Cesare wrote:
>I have generated a list of roughly equivalent packages between Linux
>distributions (currently Debian 5 and Fedora 13). The list is
>automatically generated.
[...]
Hi Silvio,
thank you for your work, it is extremely valu
You might want to look at the PackageMap project started by a
Debian/Gentoo contributor:
http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=373
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagemap
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
On Wednesday 19 January 2011 00.54:44 Silvio Cesare wrote:
> I have generated a list of roughly equivalent packages between Linux
> distributions (currently Debian 5 and Fedora 13). The list is
> automatically generated.
Cool!
Maybe I have missed a pointer or whatever: how did you compute this
s
]] Silvio Cesare
| Do you think such a list could be useful to Debian? A possible use would be
| that a user could identify an equivalent package knowing only Fedora's
| package name.
I think it'd be useful. Also, take a look at the whohas package, it
seems to do something similar, but doesn't
Silvio Cesare writes:
> I have generated a list of roughly equivalent packages between Linux
> distributions (currently Debian 5 and Fedora 13). The list is
> automatically generated.
[…]
> Do you think such a list could be useful to Debian? A possible use
> would be that a user could identify a
13 matches
Mail list logo
