Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Sam Morris:
> > I don't see why users in countries where software is not patentable
> > should be forced to jump through hoops to get access to multimedia
> > software. If this repository is not added to the user's sources.list
> > file by default then there is no adv
I don't see why users in countries where software is not patentable
should be forced to jump through hoops to get access to multimedia
software. If this repository is not added to the user's sources.list file
by default then there is no advantage in setting up yet another
repository for such
Jeremy Stanley:
> As a sponsoree myself, I'm not entirely certain I understand why
> it's any more likely that a sponsoring DD will overlook and upload a
> package with the wrong section, than that a DD will upload a
> similarly incorrect package he or she directly maintains.
Hm, that's true... s
Sam Morris:
> I don't see why users in countries where software is not patentable
> should be forced to jump through hoops to get access to multimedia
> software. If this repository is not added to the user's sources.list file
> by default then there is no advantage in setting up yet another
> rep
"Clint Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 08:11:13PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
How about just using non-free for that? In the past, patented packages
like gif encoders have been hosted there, so why can't we just use them
for mpeg en
5 matches
Mail list logo
