On 09-Oct-98 Ian Jackson wrote:
> A.6(5)(iii):
> This elimination procedure is repeated, moving down ballot papers to
> 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. preferences as required, until one option gets
> more than half of the `first' preferences.
>
> It seems to me to be clear that the intent is that if a
Darren Benham writes ("Discussion - Proposed Constitution - voting part 2"):
> I've found another area that could cause problems in the vote counting area.
> I've been running various sceanios and here's what I've found:
>
> In point 5 of A.6. describes the STV method. Basicly, if no one
> optio
2 matches
Mail list logo
