On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:11:07AM +0200, Luca Niccoli wrote:
> 2009/9/16 Russ Allbery :
>
> > If there were a document of how to do automated module builds using
> > triggers or a kernel hook, I'd be happy to try that as well.
>
> I tried to set up a kernel hook with the script I attached before
2009/9/16 Russ Allbery :
> If there were a document of how to do automated module builds using
> triggers or a kernel hook, I'd be happy to try that as well.
I tried to set up a kernel hook with the script I attached before, but failed.
If run by the kernel package postinst, m-a can't get the loc
Mike Hommey writes:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:57:06PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> That gets the new kernel installs, but I don't think it gets the
>> updates to the kernel module source package. Although I suppose we
>> could duplicate that with a postinst call to module-assistant.
> Or us
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:57:06PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mike Hommey writes:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:49:42PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> Every time either the openafs-modules-dkms package or the kernel ABI
> >> changes, a new module is automatically built. It does mean that y
Mike Hommey writes:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:49:42PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Every time either the openafs-modules-dkms package or the kernel ABI
>> changes, a new module is automatically built. It does mean that you
>> have to wait for the compile process during aptitude upgrade, but
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:49:42PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mike Hommey writes:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:41:40PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> I've been shipping an openafs-modules-dkms package since DKMS entered
> >> the archive and love it. It's far more convenient than
> >> modu
Mike Hommey writes:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:41:40PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I've been shipping an openafs-modules-dkms package since DKMS entered
>> the archive and love it. It's far more convenient than
>> module-assistant, and I hope all of the other out-of-source kernel
>> module m
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:41:40PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Hans-J. Ullrich" writes:
> > Am Dienstag 15 September 2009 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
> >> [Hans-J. Ullrich]
>
> >>> DKMS seems only be made for kernel modules. It is greart anyway, and
> >>> a good help. But what with non-kernel- mod
"Hans-J. Ullrich" writes:
> Am Dienstag 15 September 2009 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
>> [Hans-J. Ullrich]
>>> DKMS seems only be made for kernel modules. It is greart anyway, and
>>> a good help. But what with non-kernel- modules?
>> Can you give an example?
> No, sorry, I cannot. I looked at the
Am Dienstag 15 September 2009 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
> [Hans-J. Ullrich]
>
> > DKMS seems only be made for kernel modules. It is greart anyway, and
> > a good help. But what with non-kernel- modules?
>
> Can you give an example?
>
Hello Peter!
No, sorry, I cannot. I looked at the documentati
[Hans-J. Ullrich]
> DKMS seems only be made for kernel modules. It is greart anyway, and
> a good help. But what with non-kernel- modules?
Can you give an example?
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
2009/9/15 Hans-J. Ullrich :
> Hi Luca,
>
> just to make it clear: It is not the problem, how I can solve this problem!
> This problem I can easy solve with a little shell script. But there are lots
> of unexperienced users, which are not able to script themselve. They are just
> users. For those p
Le mardi 15 septembre 2009 à 11:57 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich a écrit :
> Well, of course, there is DKMS, but DKMS seems only be made for kernel
> modules. It is greart anyway, and a good help. But what with non-kernel-
> modules?
Fortunately there is not too much software with an ABI as badly
main
Am Dienstag 15 September 2009 schrieb Luca Niccoli:
> Luca
>
> P.S.
>
> For the sake of clarity I attached the modified script, it's very short.
> I didn't try it though.
>
Hi Luca,
just to make it clear: It is not the problem, how I can solve this problem!
This problem I can easy solve wit
2009/9/14 Hans-J. Ullrich :
> Problem: Whenever I upgrade to a new kernelversion, or there are new versions
> of kernel-modules or other packages, which are only available in source-code,
> it is necessary to build the new versions manually. This is rather annoying
> and it might be a problem for
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I would like to suggest a new idea, which might improve the system.
>
> Problem: Whenever I upgrade to a new kernelversion, or there are new versions
> of kernel-modules or other packages, which are only available in source-code,
> it is necessary
16 matches
Mail list logo
