On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:50:51AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 18:41 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:22:18AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 12:22 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > [Please CC me on replies. Aside: in my p
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 18:41 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:22:18AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 12:22 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > [Please CC me on replies. Aside: in my previous mail, I set both
> > > Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To to include
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:22:18AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 12:22 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > [Please CC me on replies. Aside: in my previous mail, I set both
> > Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To to include myself. What mailer and mechanism
> > did
> > you use to repl
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 12:22 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> [Please CC me on replies. Aside: in my previous mail, I set both
> Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To to include myself. What mailer and mechanism
> did
> you use to reply that didn't look at either of those headers?]
Evolution, Reply to List
[Please CC me on replies. Aside: in my previous mail, I set both
Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To to include myself. What mailer and mechanism did
you use to reply that didn't look at either of those headers?]
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 07:39 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Ben Hu
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 16:08 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes ("Detecting install vs upgrade in postinst"):
> > The postinst script for linux-image-* behaves differently on fresh
> > installation vs upgrade. For a fresh installation, it updates the
> > default symlinks /vmlinuz and
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 07:39 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 11:29 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Jun 05, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > The postinst script for linux-image-* behaves differently on fresh
> > > > installation vs upgrade. For a fresh i
Ben Hutchings writes ("Detecting install vs upgrade in postinst"):
> The postinst script for linux-image-* behaves differently on fresh
> installation vs upgrade. For a fresh installation, it updates the
> default symlinks /vmlinuz and /initrd.img to point to the new kernel
> and initramfs version
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 11:29 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Jun 05, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > The postinst script for linux-image-* behaves differently on fresh
> > > installation vs upgrade. For a fresh installation, it updates the
> > > default symlinks /vmlinuz and /i
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 11:29 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 05, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > The postinst script for linux-image-* behaves differently on fresh
> > installation vs upgrade. For a fresh installation, it updates the
> > default symlinks /vmlinuz and /initrd.img to point to the ne
On Jun 05, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The postinst script for linux-image-* behaves differently on fresh
> installation vs upgrade. For a fresh installation, it updates the
> default symlinks /vmlinuz and /initrd.img to point to the new kernel
> and initramfs versions. On upgrade it generally doesn
11 matches
Mail list logo
