Re: Debian Menu transition status

2008-05-28 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > 1) About 60% of menu files had been updated to the new menu sections. > There are still 672 packages to update. > >

Re: Debian Menu transition status

2007-10-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Bill Allombert wrote: > Others changes: > === > > -- Menu support a new format called "menu-2" since 8 years. Uhmmm, this is one of the strangest sentences I read on this list this year. At which time scale you would regard eight years old as new (at least in the

Re: Debian Menu transition status

2007-10-09 Thread Luk Claes
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 06:12:33PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > This is a status update for the Debian Menu transition. > 2) Some common mistakes to avoid: > > - Do not put menu entries _directly_ under Applications/Science, > Applications/System and Applications/Network, but in one of >

Re: Debian Menu transition

2007-07-05 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:25:06AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > [Please CC me. Thanks] > > -=| Bill Allombert, Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:45:23 +0200 |=- > > With the upload of menu 2.1.35, the transition to implement the new > > menu hierarchy discussed in bug #361418 officialy start. > > Shall package

Re: Debian Menu transition

2007-07-05 Thread Damyan Ivanov
[Please CC me. Thanks] -=| Bill Allombert, Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:45:23 +0200 |=- > With the upload of menu 2.1.35, the transition to implement the new > menu hierarchy discussed in bug #361418 officialy start. Shall packages implementing the new menu policy conflict with menu (<< 2.1.35) ? -- dam