On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:38:12 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I still don't get how the versioned Format URL will look like once DEP5
> will be shipped by debian-policy though. Would it use the Vcs-Browser of
> the debian-policy package or ...? Just curious.
From the attached diff in the first
[ Cc:-ing policy integration bug report ]
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:51:23PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> There has been no plan to subsume DEP5 into Debian Policy. The only plan
> I've seen is to turn *maintenance* of the machine-readable copyright format
> over to the Debian Policy process an
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:56:31AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:03:21AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Pointing to particular revisions is ugly, but is less ugly IMHO than
> > introducing (again) the possibility of multiple incompatible specs
> > (subtly or otherw
On ma, 2011-01-10 at 10:56 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> So, the only timeframe during which the problem can be experienced is
> from now to the solution of #609160. I wonder if it is really worth to
> address this issue properly---by changing either the intended usage of
> Format: or by addin
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:03:21AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Pointing to particular revisions is ugly, but is less ugly IMHO than
> introducing (again) the possibility of multiple incompatible specs
> (subtly or otherwise) all referred to with the same "Format"
> declaration.
That is correct
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 02:43:22PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On su, 2011-01-09 at 15:33 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Well, the point of the revision dependent url was to avoid the url
> > stopping to refer to the actual format used in the file. If you make
> > that a stable url that may chang
On su, 2011-01-09 at 15:36 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> The Files field contains a space separated files list. What to do if the
> file name contains a space? How should this space escaped?
Preferably by glaring at whoever created a source file with spaces in
the name until they fix it. Meanwhil
On su, 2011-01-09 at 15:33 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Well, the point of the revision dependent url was to avoid the url
> stopping to refer to the actual format used in the file. If you make
> that a stable url that may change content, the Format: field becomes
> pretty much useless.
See http://
Am Sonntag, den 09.01.2011, 14:27 + schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> On su, 2011-01-09 at 15:18 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Lars Wirzenius , 2011-01-09, 14:00:
> > > [3] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?rev=153&sc=0
> > >
> > >If you are interested, please give the spec a quick rea
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 02:27:44PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On su, 2011-01-09 at 15:18 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Lars Wirzenius , 2011-01-09, 14:00:
> > > [3] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?rev=153&sc=0
> > >
> > >If you are interested, please give the spec a quick rea
On su, 2011-01-09 at 14:27 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> But I guess I could change the rev=135 url to rev=153 for now, to avoid
> confusion.
Hasty brain make mistake. I changed it to
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ instead, since the r153 URL has the
wrong examples.
--
Blog/wiki/website hosti
On su, 2011-01-09 at 15:18 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Lars Wirzenius , 2011-01-09, 14:00:
> > [3] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?rev=153&sc=0
> >
> >If you are interested, please give the spec a quick read. If you find
> >any real problems, it is not too late to get them fixed.
* Lars Wirzenius , 2011-01-09, 14:00:
[3] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?rev=153&sc=0
If you are interested, please give the spec a quick read. If you find
any real problems, it is not too late to get them fixed.
Let me see:
| Example:
|
| Format: http://svn.debian.org/wsv
13 matches
Mail list logo
