Previously Thomas Guettler wrote:
> Eric:
> >Better yet, don't put packages into stable until we release. "Stable"
> >has a fairly well-defined meaning; I don't see much benefit from changing
> >it.
We already do that.
> I am new to debian-dev, why not release stable packages daily?
> Why in a s
Thank you for your answers.
Some misunderstood my idea, I don't want to remove
version numbers from packages.
Bernd:
>How do u call slink? "Old Stable"? :)
Yes, "old_stable" or "past"
Bernd:
>No i think it is not a bad idea to have a version number. The only question
>is if the Version number
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 11:58:22AM -0500, Vincent L. Mulhollon wrote:
> Perhaps any package can live in unstable, but any package that has a
> release critical bug older than 1 week is zapped from stable and placed back
> in unstable. Upon next package upload, it will be reinstated into stable.
T
"Vincent L. Mulhollon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I had a similar thought this weekend.
>
>Perhaps any package can live in unstable, but any package that has a
>release critical bug older than 1 week is zapped from stable and placed back
>in unstable. Upon next package upload, it will be reinstat
Previously Thomas Guettler wrote:
> Debian is evolving constantly, not in single steps.
True.
> But I am interested
> what you think about this crazy idea to remove
> version numbers (like debian2.2) from debian?
Won't work. Users demand a know really stable system, and with a dynamic
system we
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vincent L. Mulhollon) writes:
> Perhaps any package can live in unstable, but any package that has a
> release critical bug older than 1 week is zapped from stable and placed back
> in unstable. Upon next package upload, it will be reinstated into stable.
Ack! Can you imagine
Thomas Guettler wrote:
> But I am interested
> what you think about this crazy idea to remove
> version numbers (like debian2.2) from debian?
It's really crazy. Removing version numbers mean that the
dependency graph must be synchronized globally which is
impossible AFAIK. In addition to this, it
> A Debian package is either unstable, (testing) or stable.
> And everybody should use the package that fits his needs.
>
> Debian is evolving constantly, not in single steps.
>
> But I am interested
> what you think about this crazy idea to remove
> version numbers (like debian2.2) from debian?
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:05:58PM +0200, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> But I am interested
> what you think about this crazy idea to remove
> version numbers (like debian2.2) from debian?
How do u call slink? "Old Stable"? :)
No i think it is not a bad idea to have a version number. The only question
9 matches
Mail list logo
