RE: Counter-Proposal: Architecture Versions and Architecture Features

Andreas Barth wrote: > * Julian Mehnle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030627 21:05]: > > [...] > > Thanks for your proposal. IMHO it is important that we are going to > adopt one or the other proposal rather soon, so that it could be used in > sarge. I agree. > Now to comments: > > > Every base arch (al

Re: Counter-Proposal: Architecture Versions and Architecture Features

* Julian Mehnle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030627 21:05]: > I understand that the your proposed extensions to the Debian package system > are based on the concepts of "sub-archs" and "meta-sub-archs" (I'd call > these "pseudo-sub-archs" or "alias-sub-archs", though). I have already > proposed a more gen