On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:24 PM Xavier wrote:
> Second: a lot of package have also their public source repo. See
> https://tracker.debian.org and follow "VCS" links to access to
> git/svn/... repo.
Aside from the VCS links on packages that use a VCS, the package
tracker also links to sources.de
On 2021-08-11 14:08 +0200, Hans wrote:
> And best: It is all GPL licensed,
It's all free software, but many licences are used, not just the GPL.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM
http://wookware.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2021, 13:34:27 CEST schrieb Horler, Johannes:
Hi Johannes,
every code of every debian package in debian/main is downloadable from the
repo.
You also get all needed stuff for the most used compiler and interpereter
languages, C, python, perl, lua, java, whatever you want
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:34:27AM +, Horler, Johannes wrote:
> Dear Debian Team,
>
>
> hopefully I am writing this to the right email address. (In case I am
> not, I would be happy about being refered.) Recently I got interested in
> operating systems. Now I want to try to experiment with mo
On 8/11/21 7:34 AM, Horler, Johannes wrote:
Dear Debian Team,
hopefully I am writing this to the right email address. (In case I am
not, I would be happy about being refered.) Recently I got interested
in operating systems. Now I want to try to experiment with modifying one.
Is the complet
Le 11/08/2021 à 13:34, Horler, Johannes a écrit :
> Dear Debian Team,
>
>
> hopefully I am writing this to the right email address. (In case I am
> not, I would be happy about being refered.) Recently I got interested in
> operating systems. Now I want to try to experiment with modifying one.
>
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On വെള്ളി 10 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 09:36 വൈകു, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I wonder if this was a case of the code not being sufficient
> > description? [IE, code and a good text description would be accepted,
> > but code only was not?]
>
> These packages were
Pirate Praveen writes ("Re: Code in Description [Was: Re:
node-tty-browserify_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED]"):
> These packages were rejected and their description is given below.
I agree with ftpmaster's decision in all of these cases.
In the case of node-is-obj and node-i
On വെള്ളി 10 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 09:36 വൈകു, Don Armstrong wrote:
> This is news to me. Policy §5.6.13 ('Description') doesn't explicitely
> forbid using code (or pseudocode), and even allows for verbatim lines
> (which start with two or more spaces).
>
> I wonder if this was a case of the code not bei
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 11:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> debian-devel seems entirely the wrong list for that discussion.
It was supposed to go elsewhere but mistakenly ended up here. Sorry for the
noise.
--
Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC
me in replies for
On 12/22/2016 11:40 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-December/126684.html
>
> Some have praised BSD code to be better than Linux's. And this link says that
> Linux is trying to be too perfect in terms of code.
>
> Given that BSDs are also a supp
Joe Smith wrote:
>
> OE does support threading for Email, it is simply disabled by
> default. However overall the threading is more accuracte an reliable
> for newsgroups.
Until this MUA is released under a free license and ported to the GNU
system so it can be packaged, this crucial detail is ou
"Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:39:51AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common.
It sort of depends on what you're looking for.
Some advanta
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * E-mail generally has a "wider reach" -- it gets past corporate
>> firewalls, (my company has never allowed external nntp connections),
>> works even on strange systems, etc.
>
> Point. Then again, if your corporate sysadmins don't want you
Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Matthias Julius wrote:
> [Mail vs. News]
>> * A mailing list is easier to distribute with a slow
>> server/connection. If a mail takes 3 minutes to show up in your
>> mailbox it doesn't matter. If each news post takes 15 seconds to
>> load i
* Matthias Julius wrote:
[Mail vs. News]
> * A mailing list is easier to distribute with a slow
> server/connection. If a mail takes 3 minutes to show up in your
> mailbox it doesn't matter. If each news post takes 15 seconds to
> load it gets annoying.
Programs like slrnpull and leafnode wh
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 01:47:59PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:39:51AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > * E-mail generally has a "wider reach" -- it gets past corporate
> > firewalls, (my company has never allowed external nntp connections),
> > works even on
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:39:51AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> "Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common.
>
> It sort of depends on what you're looking for.
>
> Some advantages of mailing lists:
>
> * E-mail generally has a "wider reach" --
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common.
>
> It sort of depends on what you're looking for.
>
> Some advantages of mailing lists:
>
> * E-mail generally has a "wider reach" -- it gets past corporate
>
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common.
It sort of depends on what you're looking for.
Some advantages of mailing lists:
* E-mail generally has a "wider reach" -- it gets past corporate
firewalls, (my company has never allowed external
"Ben Pfaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
No problem at all. Especially with gmane.org around. I used to
subscribe to dozens of mailing lists, but now I can just browse
all of them as newsgroups.
I agree, I use Gm
Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 04 August 2006 09:57, Wouter Verhelst took the opportunity to say:
>> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>> > In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs,
>> > as well as MTAs. An RFC s
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> This would be absolutely horrible. Most list subscribers use the
>> headers to put list email in separate directories, and this would make
>> some mails miss from the discussion.
> It's an end-user configu
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> This would be absolutely horrible. Most list subscribers use the headers
> to put list email in separate directories, and this would make some
> mails miss from the discussion.
It's an end-user configurable feature of mailman, so you can turn it on
On Friday 04 August 2006 09:57, Wouter Verhelst took the opportunity to say:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs,
> > as well as MTAs. An RFC straightening things out could help.
>
> ... Or we
Le vendredi 04 août 2006 à 09:45 -0400, James Vega a écrit :
> This is something that should be solved on the list manager side by not
> sending a duplicate of the email when it can see that an email was
> already sent to an address it recognizes. In fact, some of the lists
> I'm subscribed to do
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers
> > as "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that
> > purpose. I expect my MUA to Do The Right T
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers
> > as "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that
> > purpose. I expect my MUA to Do The Right T
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs, as
> well as MTAs. An RFC straightening things out could help.
... Or we could all just forget about mailinglists and start using
newsgroups instead. They don
On Thursday 03 August 2006 23:37, John Goerzen took the opportunity to say:
> The mailer is doing the right thing. Sending a CC isn't a "shout".
>
> The sender isn't. If the sender doesn't want CCs, it's fully within the
> sender's power to specify that in the list headers. Most senders on
> thi
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers
> as "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that
> purpose. I expect my MUA to Do The Right Thing (TM).
Most MUAs will do the right thing when you reply; they'll
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am on dozens of mailing lists. There are thousands of participants on
> this list alone. I subscribe to, and leave, mailing lists all the time.
> Why should a person with a personal preference expect me to shoulder the
> burden of maintaining a mental
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 01:27:15AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> On Friday 04 August 2006 00:37, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > If your mailer makes you automatically go shouting on the push of a
> > > button, it may be time to download the source and get some serious
> > > hacking done.
> >
> > The ma
On Friday 04 August 2006 00:37, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:24:10PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers as
> > > "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that
> > > purpose. I expect my MUA to
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:24:10PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers as
> > "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that purpose.
> > I expect my MUA to Do The Right Thing (TM). It usually does, except on
> > the
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 20:30 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:20:26AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:34 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok, third time. Please do not do that:
> > > > To: George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > CC: de
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:41:05 +0300 (EEST)
"Ozgur Karatas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> i want to help as much as i can. i dont know very much but i want to
> help debian evolve and improve myself at the same time. i am coding
> small applications for this purpose. they could help some.
Y
Or uptime(1)CesareOn 6/30/06, Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load> and usage.As far as I can see it, you're reading the exact same information as top(1)...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ozgur Karatas wrote:
> Re,
> ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load
> and usage.
> regards.
But top(1) also does that, no?
Or is the difference that it is a "running total", like ping?
Still, this app is so small t
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:18:58PM +0300, Ozgur Karatas wrote:
> ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load
> and usage.
top reports these. For example:
| Tasks: 112 total, 2 running, 109 sleeping, 1 stopped, 0 zombie
| Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni,
> ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load
> and usage.
As far as I can see it, you're reading the exact same information as top(1)...
--
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl
GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC
http://tokkee.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
i want to help as much as i can. i dont know very much but i want to help
debian evolve and improve myself at the same time. i am coding small
applications for this purpose. they could help some.
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:18:58 +0300 (EEST)
> "Ozgur Karatas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> R
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:18:58 +0300 (EEST)
"Ozgur Karatas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re,
> ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's
> load and usage.
huh?
My top shows (admittedly not on my desktop machine;) shows:
15:31:22 up 50 days, 2:41, 2 users, load ave
Re,
ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load
and usage.
regards.
> top(1) gives the exact same information. What's the advantage of your
> program?
>
> Cheers,
> Sebastian
>
> --
> Sebastian "tokkee" Harl
> GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC
> http://tokkee.org/
,''`. Ozgur
> This code is written to
> take CPU loading statistics. cpustat; shows the usage load statistic of
> your CPU.
top(1) gives the exact same information. What's the advantage of your program?
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl
GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC
http://tokkee.org/
signature.asc
De
45 matches
Mail list logo