Re: Code

2021-08-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:24 PM Xavier wrote: > Second: a lot of package have also their public source repo. See > https://tracker.debian.org and follow "VCS" links to access to > git/svn/... repo. Aside from the VCS links on packages that use a VCS, the package tracker also links to sources.de

Re: Code

2021-08-11 Thread Wookey
On 2021-08-11 14:08 +0200, Hans wrote: > And best: It is all GPL licensed, It's all free software, but many licences are used, not just the GPL. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Code

2021-08-11 Thread Hans
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2021, 13:34:27 CEST schrieb Horler, Johannes: Hi Johannes, every code of every debian package in debian/main is downloadable from the repo. You also get all needed stuff for the most used compiler and interpereter languages, C, python, perl, lua, java, whatever you want

Re: Code

2021-08-11 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:34:27AM +, Horler, Johannes wrote: > Dear Debian Team, > > > hopefully I am writing this to the right email address. (In case I am > not, I would be happy about being refered.) Recently I got interested in > operating systems. Now I want to try to experiment with mo

Re: Code

2021-08-11 Thread Kyle Edwards
On 8/11/21 7:34 AM, Horler, Johannes wrote: Dear Debian Team, hopefully I am writing this to the right email address. (In case I am not, I would be happy about being refered.) Recently I got interested in operating systems. Now I want to try to experiment with modifying one. Is the complet

Re: Code

2021-08-11 Thread Xavier
Le 11/08/2021 à 13:34, Horler, Johannes a écrit : > Dear Debian Team, > > > hopefully I am writing this to the right email address. (In case I am > not, I would be happy about being refered.) Recently I got interested in > operating systems. Now I want to try to experiment with modifying one. >

Re: Code in Description [Was: Re: node-tty-browserify_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED]

2017-02-11 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On വെള്ളി 10 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 09:36 വൈകു, Don Armstrong wrote: > > I wonder if this was a case of the code not being sufficient > > description? [IE, code and a good text description would be accepted, > > but code only was not?] > > These packages were

Re: Code in Description [Was: Re: node-tty-browserify_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED]

2017-02-11 Thread Ian Jackson
Pirate Praveen writes ("Re: Code in Description [Was: Re: node-tty-browserify_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED]"): > These packages were rejected and their description is given below. I agree with ftpmaster's decision in all of these cases. In the case of node-is-obj and node-i

Re: Code in Description [Was: Re: node-tty-browserify_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED]

2017-02-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 10 ഫെബ്രുവരി 2017 09:36 വൈകു, Don Armstrong wrote: > This is news to me. Policy §5.6.13 ('Description') doesn't explicitely > forbid using code (or pseudocode), and even allows for verbatim lines > (which start with two or more spaces). > > I wonder if this was a case of the code not bei

Re: code quality

2016-12-22 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 11:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > debian-devel seems entirely the wrong list for that discussion. It was supposed to go elsewhere but mistakenly ended up here. Sorry for the noise. -- Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC me in replies for

Re: code quality

2016-12-22 Thread Julien Cristau
On 12/22/2016 11:40 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-December/126684.html > > Some have praised BSD code to be better than Linux's. And this link says that > Linux is trying to be too perfect in terms of code. > > Given that BSDs are also a supp

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-09-02 Thread Yavor Doganov
Joe Smith wrote: > > OE does support threading for Email, it is simply disabled by > default. However overall the threading is more accuracte an reliable > for newsgroups. Until this MUA is released under a free license and ported to the GNU system so it can be packaged, this crucial detail is ou

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-09-02 Thread Joe Smith
"Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:39:51AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: "Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common. It sort of depends on what you're looking for. Some advanta

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-15 Thread Miles Bader
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> * E-mail generally has a "wider reach" -- it gets past corporate >> firewalls, (my company has never allowed external nntp connections), >> works even on strange systems, etc. > > Point. Then again, if your corporate sysadmins don't want you

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-15 Thread Matthias Julius
Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Matthias Julius wrote: > [Mail vs. News] >> * A mailing list is easier to distribute with a slow >> server/connection. If a mail takes 3 minutes to show up in your >> mailbox it doesn't matter. If each news post takes 15 seconds to >> load i

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-15 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Matthias Julius wrote: [Mail vs. News] > * A mailing list is easier to distribute with a slow > server/connection. If a mail takes 3 minutes to show up in your > mailbox it doesn't matter. If each news post takes 15 seconds to > load it gets annoying. Programs like slrnpull and leafnode wh

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 01:47:59PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:39:51AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > > * E-mail generally has a "wider reach" -- it gets past corporate > > firewalls, (my company has never allowed external nntp connections), > > works even on

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-15 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:39:51AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > "Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common. > > It sort of depends on what you're looking for. > > Some advantages of mailing lists: > > * E-mail generally has a "wider reach" --

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-14 Thread Matthias Julius
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common. > > It sort of depends on what you're looking for. > > Some advantages of mailing lists: > > * E-mail generally has a "wider reach" -- it gets past corporate >

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-06 Thread Miles Bader
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common. It sort of depends on what you're looking for. Some advantages of mailing lists: * E-mail generally has a "wider reach" -- it gets past corporate firewalls, (my company has never allowed external

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-05 Thread Joe Smith
"Ben Pfaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: No problem at all. Especially with gmane.org around. I used to subscribe to dozens of mailing lists, but now I can just browse all of them as newsgroups. I agree, I use Gm

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-04 Thread Ben Pfaff
Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 04 August 2006 09:57, Wouter Verhelst took the opportunity to say: >> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: >> > In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs, >> > as well as MTAs. An RFC s

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote: >> This would be absolutely horrible. Most list subscribers use the >> headers to put list email in separate directories, and this would make >> some mails miss from the discussion. > It's an end-user configu

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-04 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote: > This would be absolutely horrible. Most list subscribers use the headers > to put list email in separate directories, and this would make some > mails miss from the discussion. It's an end-user configurable feature of mailman, so you can turn it on

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-04 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Friday 04 August 2006 09:57, Wouter Verhelst took the opportunity to say: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > > In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs, > > as well as MTAs. An RFC straightening things out could help. > > ... Or we

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 04 août 2006 à 09:45 -0400, James Vega a écrit : > This is something that should be solved on the list manager side by not > sending a duplicate of the email when it can see that an email was > already sent to an address it recognizes. In fact, some of the lists > I'm subscribed to do

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-04 Thread James Vega
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers > > as "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that > > purpose. I expect my MUA to Do The Right T

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-04 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers > > as "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that > > purpose. I expect my MUA to Do The Right T

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-04 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs, as > well as MTAs. An RFC straightening things out could help. ... Or we could all just forget about mailinglists and start using newsgroups instead. They don

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-03 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Thursday 03 August 2006 23:37, John Goerzen took the opportunity to say: > The mailer is doing the right thing. Sending a CC isn't a "shout". > > The sender isn't. If the sender doesn't want CCs, it's fully within the > sender's power to specify that in the list headers. Most senders on > thi

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-03 Thread Ben Finney
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers > as "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that > purpose. I expect my MUA to Do The Right Thing (TM). Most MUAs will do the right thing when you reply; they'll

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-03 Thread Matthias Julius
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am on dozens of mailing lists. There are thousands of participants on > this list alone. I subscribe to, and leave, mailing lists all the time. > Why should a person with a personal preference expect me to shoulder the > burden of maintaining a mental

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-03 Thread John Goerzen
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 01:27:15AM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > On Friday 04 August 2006 00:37, John Goerzen wrote: > > > If your mailer makes you automatically go shouting on the push of a > > > button, it may be time to download the source and get some serious > > > hacking done. > > > > The ma

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-03 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 04 August 2006 00:37, John Goerzen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:24:10PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers as > > > "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that > > > purpose. I expect my MUA to

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-03 Thread John Goerzen
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:24:10PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers as > > "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that purpose. > > I expect my MUA to Do The Right Thing (TM). It usually does, except on > > the

Re: Code of Conduct on the Debian mailinglists

2006-08-03 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 20:30 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:20:26AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:34 -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > > > > > > Ok, third time. Please do not do that: > > > > To: George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > CC: de

Re: code cpustat.c

2006-06-30 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:41:05 +0300 (EEST) "Ozgur Karatas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > i want to help as much as i can. i dont know very much but i want to > help debian evolve and improve myself at the same time. i am coding > small applications for this purpose. they could help some. Y

Re: code cpustat.c

2006-06-30 Thread Cesare Tensi
Or uptime(1)CesareOn 6/30/06, Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load> and usage.As far as I can see it, you're reading the exact same information as top(1)...

Re: code cpustat.c

2006-06-30 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ozgur Karatas wrote: > Re, > ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load > and usage. > regards. But top(1) also does that, no? Or is the difference that it is a "running total", like ping? Still, this app is so small t

Re: code cpustat.c

2006-06-30 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:18:58PM +0300, Ozgur Karatas wrote: > ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load > and usage. top reports these. For example: | Tasks: 112 total, 2 running, 109 sleeping, 1 stopped, 0 zombie | Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni,

Re: code cpustat.c

2006-06-30 Thread Sebastian Harl
> ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load > and usage. As far as I can see it, you're reading the exact same information as top(1)... -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC http://tokkee.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: code cpustat.c

2006-06-30 Thread Ozgur Karatas
Hello, i want to help as much as i can. i dont know very much but i want to help debian evolve and improve myself at the same time. i am coding small applications for this purpose. they could help some. > On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:18:58 +0300 (EEST) > "Ozgur Karatas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> R

Re: code cpustat.c

2006-06-30 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:18:58 +0300 (EEST) "Ozgur Karatas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Re, > ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's > load and usage. huh? My top shows (admittedly not on my desktop machine;) shows: 15:31:22 up 50 days, 2:41, 2 users, load ave

Re: code cpustat.c

2006-06-30 Thread Ozgur Karatas
Re, ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load and usage. regards. > top(1) gives the exact same information. What's the advantage of your > program? > > Cheers, > Sebastian > > -- > Sebastian "tokkee" Harl > GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC > http://tokkee.org/ ,''`. Ozgur

Re: code cpustat.c

2006-06-30 Thread Sebastian Harl
> This code is written to > take CPU loading statistics. cpustat; shows the usage load statistic of > your CPU. top(1) gives the exact same information. What's the advantage of your program? Cheers, Sebastian -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC http://tokkee.org/ signature.asc De