Hi
On Friday 13 January 2012, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
[...]
> > 1. Did anybody *really* *honestly* tried to base NX protocol
> > on plain X libraries? If this is not possible
>
> FreeNX upstream tried to rebase them to X.org long time ago and claimed
This was intended to mean modu
Hi
On Friday 13 January 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:39:02AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > And still, my basic (inner and outer) question is:
> >
> > 1. how can we enrol other people with our endeavour
> > 2. what is needed to enrol people
> > 3. is there a
On Fr, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:10:16 (CET), Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/13/2012 05:23 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 10:00:29 CET Alexander Wirt wrote:
>>
Note that we have tested loads of different build variants against
Xorg 7. The highest stability (which is
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:50:37AM +, Philip Hands wrote:
> Yes, having talked to the lead developer on NX _years_ ago (2003 IIRC),
> he spent quite some time trying to persuade the X folks that he had ways
> of getting rid of (largely pointless) round-trips and the like. He said
> that having
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:39:02AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> And still, my basic (inner and outer) question is:
>
> 1. how can we enrol other people with our endeavour
> 2. what is needed to enrol people
> 3. is there anyonr in this discussion who can point us to next possible steps
>
Hi Phil,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 12:50:37 CET Philip Hands wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:35:30 +0100, Mike Gabriel
wrote:
...
Everything in this mail is just a guess, things in reality have very
probably been completely different.
Yes, having talked to the lead developer on NX _years_ ago (2003
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:35:30 +0100, Mike Gabriel
wrote:
...
> Everything in this mail is just a guess, things in reality have very
> probably been completely different.
Yes, having talked to the lead developer on NX _years_ ago (2003 IIRC),
he spent quite some time trying to persuade the X fol
Hi Thomas,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 12:10:16 CET Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 01/13/2012 05:23 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 10:00:29 CET Alexander Wirt wrote:
Note that we have tested loads of different build variants against
Xorg 7. The highest stability (which is virtually no s
On 01/13/2012 05:23 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 10:00:29 CET Alexander Wirt wrote:
>
>>> Note that we have tested loads of different build variants against
>>> Xorg 7. The highest stability (which is virtually no session crashes
>>> anymore) we ever achieved is by the w
Hi Alex,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 10:00:29 CET Alexander Wirt wrote:
Note that we have tested loads of different build variants against
Xorg 7. The highest stability (which is virtually no session crashes
anymore) we ever achieved is by the way we currently build the code
as one monolith.
This is not
Mike Gabriel schrieb am Freitag, den 13. Januar 2012:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 08:55:17 CET Alexander Wirt wrote:
>
> >brian m. carlson schrieb am Friday, den 13. January 2012:
> >
> >>On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:57:37AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> >>> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 00:37:57 CET Stef
Hi Alex,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 08:55:17 CET Alexander Wirt wrote:
brian m. carlson schrieb am Friday, den 13. January 2012:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:57:37AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 00:37:57 CET Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> >forked monolithic X.org 6.9 source tree.
>
>
brian m. carlson schrieb am Friday, den 13. January 2012:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:57:37AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > On Fr 13 Jan 2012 00:37:57 CET Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > >forked monolithic X.org 6.9 source tree.
> >
> > This is indeed the case.
>
> I can't speak for the ftp
Hi Brianm,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 04:04:38 CET "brian m. carlson" wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:57:37AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 00:37:57 CET Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>forked monolithic X.org 6.9 source tree.
This is indeed the case.
I can't speak for the ftpmasters
Hi all,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 06:40:45 CET Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 01/13/2012 11:04 AM, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:57:37AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 00:37:57 CET Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
forked monolithic X.org 6.9 source tree.
This is indeed
On 01/13/2012 11:04 AM, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:57:37AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>
>> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 00:37:57 CET Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>>
>>> forked monolithic X.org 6.9 source tree.
>>>
>> This is indeed the case.
>>
> I can't speak f
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:57:37AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 00:37:57 CET Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> >forked monolithic X.org 6.9 source tree.
>
> This is indeed the case.
I can't speak for the ftpmasters and Security Team, but honestly I can't
see why they would allow
Hi Stefan,
I am discussing here being in a double role. I am part of X2Go
upstream, redistributing the nx-libs tarballs and also member of the
Debian X2Go packaging team.
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 00:37:57 CET Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Friday 13 January 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Pack
Hi
On Friday 13 January 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2012-01-06
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name : nx-libs
>Version : 3.5.0.3
>Upstream Author : Mike Gabriel, Oleksandr Shneyder, Reinhard Tartler
> * URL : wiki.x2go.org
> * License : GPLv2
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
