gregor herrmann writes:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:54:54 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
>> Many executables in .../sbin have their man pages in section 1 instead
>> of section 8.
>> Perhaps a piuparts like script could comb over the apt-file search
>> results to target them.
> Sounds more like
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 570991 -1
Bug#570991: tuxtype: Package with doc/AUTHORS and doc/ChangeLog and doc/TODO
Bug 570991 cloned as bug 570994.
> reassign -1 lintian
Bug #570994 [tuxtype] tuxtype: Package with doc/AUTHORS and doc/ChangeLog and
doc/TODO
Bug reassi
# Cc to -devel for information after the reassign
merge 570980 348864
thanks
Holger Levsen wrote, Monday, February 22, 2010 5:19 PM
clone 570991 -1
reassign -1 lintian
retitle -1 "please add a check against commands in /sbin using section 1
manpages"
fwiw, there *was* such a lintian check, wh
clone 570991 -1
reassign -1 lintian
retitle -1 "please add a check against commands in /sbin using section 1
manpages"
severity -1 wishlist
block 570991 by 476403
block 570991 by 512447
block 570991 by 512449
block 570991 by 512450
block 570991 by 512451
block 570991 by 512452
block 570991 by 5709
I tried to find all bugs with "section 8" in their title via
http://bugs.debian.org
An error occurred. Error was: You have to choose something to select by
I'll try this to at least find (most of) mine:
$ w3m -cols -dump
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?submitter=jida...@jidan
Hi Sandro,
please don't cc: me, I'm subscribed.
On Montag, 22. Februar 2010, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > I'm tempted to close this bug or reassign to reportbug ;-)
> Please don't.
Neither? ;)
> The one above is the description of 'general' we retrieve from
> [1], that's the canonical place for defin
Hi jidanni,
On Montag, 22. Februar 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Then I got this great idea that instead of me just mentioning in to
> packages that I've stumbled into, there could be a systematic combing of
> all Debian.
Can you point me to bugs about manpages in section 1 which belong in s
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 17:07, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> P.S., I am sure I filed this bug in the right place, as reportbug says
>> "general General problems (e.g., that many manpages are mode 755)".
>
> I'm tempted to close this bug or reassign to reportbug ;-)
Please don't.
> IME bugs against
> t
HL> Do you intend to file individual bugs? I'd appreciate this.
Actually I've filed many individual bugs, some even just today.
Then I got this great idea that instead of me just mentioning in to
packages that I've stumbled into, there could be a systematic combing of
all Debian.
--
To UNSUBS
Hi jidanni,
On Montag, 22. Februar 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Many executables in .../sbin have their man pages in section 1 instead
> of section 8.
This is indeed a policy violation as it's covered by policy indirectly via
FHS:
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHAREMANMA
10 matches
Mail list logo
