On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 12:53 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:50:38 +0100
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:18:57AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > Just out of interest, what's the difference between doc-central and
> > > dwww ?
> >
> > That's a p
Le Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:00:25PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> I find this request of yours unsubstantiated.
>
> The RC bug has a patch pending and is pretty easy to fix. I might
> eventually NMU it to fix that, even though I'm not willing to maintain
> the package right now. Beside tha
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:50:38 +0100
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:18:57AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Just out of interest, what's the difference between doc-central and
> > dwww ?
>
> That's a pretty damn good question :-)
>
> I've made the choice between dwww and
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:18:57AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Just out of interest, what's the difference between doc-central and
> dwww ?
That's a pretty damn good question :-)
I've made the choice between dwww and doc-central several years
ago. _IIRC_ , back then dwww was missing decent bro
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:00:25 +0100
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The RC bug has a patch pending and is pretty easy to fix. I might
> eventually NMU it to fix that, even though I'm not willing to maintain
> the package right now. Beside that bug, the package works quite well,
> has a respectable nu
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 04:12:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> doc-central has one release-critical bug, making it unfit for the release. Are
> there volunteers to adopt it? Robert? The QA team? Otherwise, despite it is
> useful, it is maybe time to give up and remove it from our archive...
I f
6 matches
Mail list logo
