On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:50:37AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Stefano Zacchiroli [2009-10-13 11:03:00 CEST]:
> > What if one has no idea of what "gitosis" is? For such a person, the
> > above description will be close to meaningless. I suggest expanding in a
> > couple of word
* Filippo Rusconi [2009-10-13 12:06:29 CEST]:
> Well, I think that ITP bugs are *more* useful when the person reading
> the bug report can tell what the intended-to-be-packaged software
> does.
There's always the upstream URL included that you can follow if you
think it's unclear anyway.
> Some
on 13/10/09 14:33 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:15:24AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>
>> Description : standalone, souped-up version of gitosis
>>
>> Gitolite is a rewrite of gitosis, with a completely different config
>> file that allows (at last!) access control
Greetings Debianists,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:50:37AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> * Stefano Zacchiroli [2009-10-13 11:03:00 CEST]:
> > What if one has no idea of what "gitosis" is? For such a person, the
> > above description will be close to meaningless. I suggest expandi
Hi!
* Stefano Zacchiroli [2009-10-13 11:03:00 CEST]:
> What if one has no idea of what "gitosis" is? For such a person, the
> above description will be close to meaningless. I suggest expanding in a
> couple of words what gitosis is, turning the reference to it as
> something like "simila
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:15:24AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Description : standalone, souped-up version of gitosis
>
> Gitolite is a rewrite of gitosis, with a completely different config
> file that allows (at last!) access control down to the branch level,
> including specifying who
6 matches
Mail list logo
