Re: Bug#544035: RFH: stlport5.2 -- STLport C++ class library

2009-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:33:44PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Can anyone explain if/why stlport is still useful? Given the low > popcon, and small number of rdepends, could this be a candidate for > removal? libstlport4.6 has to be kept on i386 for ABI issues. For the rest[1], yes I agree

Re: Bug#544035: RFH: stlport5.2 -- STLport C++ class library

2009-08-28 Thread David Bremner
Can anyone explain if/why stlport is still useful? Given the low popcon, and small number of rdepends, could this be a candidate for removal? all the best, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis