Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-11-16 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
reassign 503096 emacs-goodies-el retitle 503096 emacs-goodies-el: please include alpaca.el thanks On November 3, 2008 at 1:08PM +0100, zack (at debian.org) wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:51:55PM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > > I don't intend to push alpaca into the Emacs main tree. Plea

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-11-04 Thread Joerg Jaspert
>> > Hence the question goes as: considering that the next release of >> > Debian is most likely going to be released with Emacs (>= 23.1), which >> > is integrated properly with EasyPG, do we need alpaca in Debian? I >> > believe the answer is «no». >> I think that the alpaca package isn't meaning

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-11-03 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:51:55PM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > I don't intend to push alpaca into the Emacs main tree. Please > allow making just an optional Debian package. > > Does anyone still strongly have objection to this ITP? If so, > please tell me against the above comments. Yes,

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-11-03 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On October 26, 2008 at 9:12PM +0900, tats (at debian.org) wrote: > On October 26, 2008 at 11:11AM +0100, > zack (at debian.org) wrote: > > > Indeed, the fact that EasyPG is now integrated in development version > > of Emacs is my main reason for objecting this ITP. > [...] > > Hence the question

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-27 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On October 26, 2008 at 3:34PM +, rswarbrick (at googlemail.com) wrote: > > `alpaca' uses symmetric encryption with "--cipher-algo AES" for a > > new *.gpg file by default, while I haven't found an easy way to > > customizet EasyPG. > > > > Anyway, the point of this post: gpg's default symmetri

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-26 Thread Rupert Swarbrick
Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think that the alpaca package isn't meaningless even if less > people use alpaca than EasyPG. Grr. It's FEWER! > > `alpaca' uses symmetric encryption with "--cipher-algo AES" for a > new *.gpg file by default, while I haven't found an easy way to

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-26 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On October 26, 2008 at 11:11AM +0100, zack (at debian.org) wrote: > Indeed, the fact that EasyPG is now integrated in development version > of Emacs is my main reason for objecting this ITP. [...] > Hence the question goes as: considering that the next release of > Debian is most likely going to b

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-26 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:14:53PM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > > I think that a package for one single file is too much. I agree with Luca here. FWIW I also formally object to this ITP. > Even so, the Debian package is helpful for users to install, > upgrade and use it. This is not an argu

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-24 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On October 25, 2008 at 12:34AM +0200, joerg (at debian.org) wrote: > On 11548 March 1977, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > > >> How about integrating/merging alpaca into EasyPG? > > Anyway, alpaca is a different implementation and well maintained by > > the other developer. I think that the alpaca pack

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-24 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11548 March 1977, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: >> How about integrating/merging alpaca into EasyPG? > Anyway, alpaca is a different implementation and well maintained by > the other developer. I think that the alpaca package isn't > meaningless even if less people use alpaca than EasyPG. There is

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-24 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On October 24, 2008 at 9:18AM +0200, siretart (at debian.org) wrote: > How about integrating/merging alpaca into EasyPG? I'll request the always-use-symmetric option to the EasyPG developer, which is a major blocker of migrating from alpaca to EasyPG, I think. Anyway, alpaca is a different imple

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-24 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway, I'll add more information to the package description and > README.Debian. Also, I'll consider the conflict of EasyPG. The > alpaca feature should not be enabled when EasyPG's epa-file feature > is enabled. How about integrating/merging al

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-23 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
Hi Luca, thanks for the comment. On October 22, 2008 at 7:18PM +0200, luca (at pca.it) wrote: > > * Package name: alpaca > [...] > > * URL : http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/cipher/ > > I think that a package for one single file is too much. Even so, the Debian package is helpful fo

Re: Bug#503096: ITP: alpaca -- GnuPG file handling for Emacs

2008-10-22 Thread Luca Capello
Hi Tatsuya! On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:58:11 +0200, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > * Package name: alpaca [...] > * URL : http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/cipher/ I think that a package for one single file is too much. > Description : GnuPG file handling for Emacs > `alpaca' is an Em