Hi Matthias,
Quoting Matthias Urlichs (2024-12-15 06:33:35)
> On 12.12.24 12:48, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 08:57:57AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> >> On 04.12.24 18:08, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >>> in the
> >>> absence of a debian/dont_touch_my_package file, any Debian Dev
On 12.12.24 12:48, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 08:57:57AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
On 04.12.24 18:08, Andreas Tille wrote:
in the
absence of a debian/dont_touch_my_package file, any Debian Developer is
permitted to upload the package.
I like this idea.
so you like reali
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 08:57:57AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> On 04.12.24 18:08, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > in the
> > absence of a debian/dont_touch_my_package file, any Debian Developer is
> > permitted to upload the package.
> I like this idea.
so you like reality. good.
--
cheers,
On 04/12/24 18:08, Andreas Tille wrote:
We could introduce this change starting with Debian Policy version X.
Maintainers who adopt this policy version by updating the
Standards-Version in their packages would implicitly agree that, in the
absence of a debian/dont_touch_my_package file, any Debia
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 09:36:01AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > in the
> > > absence of a debian/dont_touch_my_package file, any Debian Developer is
> > > permitted to upload the package.
> >
> > I like this idea.
> >
> > The next step: agree on a "standard" Debian workflow and allow
> >
Quoting Matthias Urlichs (2024-12-12 08:57:57)
> On 04.12.24 18:08, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > in the
> > absence of a debian/dont_touch_my_package file, any Debian Developer is
> > permitted to upload the package.
>
> I like this idea.
>
> The next step: agree on a "standard" Debian workflow and a
On 04.12.24 18:08, Andreas Tille wrote:
in the
absence of a debian/dont_touch_my_package file, any Debian Developer is
permitted to upload the package.
I like this idea.
The next step: agree on a "standard" Debian workflow and allow
(encourage?) people to convert existing packages to it (assu
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 06:08:00PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I wonder if we should reconsider the default assumption of package
> ownership. Instead, we could introduce a file, such as
> debian/dont_touch_my_package (or a similarly named file), where
> maintainers can document their reasons for
8 matches
Mail list logo