* Sander Smeenk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > Very nice :) But I have 2 things:
> > > 1) Where's apache2-modules? Subversion depends on them!
> > Subversion needs to update :) Happily, I don't have to be back compat, but I
> > will add a provides fo
Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Very nice :) But I have 2 things:
> > 1) Where's apache2-modules? Subversion depends on them!
> Subversion needs to update :) Happily, I don't have to be back compat, but I
> will add a provides for apache2-modules. We scrapped the seperate deb as it
>
* Sander Smeenk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > As those of you who read slashdot know, Apache 2.0 was released last night.
> > deb http://pandora.debian.org/~thom/apache2 ./
>
> Very nice :) But I have 2 things:
>
> 1) Where's apache2-modules? Subversio
Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> As those of you who read slashdot know, Apache 2.0 was released last night.
> deb http://pandora.debian.org/~thom/apache2 ./
Very nice :) But I have 2 things:
1) Where's apache2-modules? Subversion depends on them!
2) Why is apache2 compiled against libd
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 11:24:22PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > Reasons enough to release woody+1 not too late.
> >
> > Speaking of which, woody+1 sounds like it's going to be a release similar to
> > link -- no huge changes to cause a prolongued release time.
>
> So, the Debian Installer is
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 11:19:49PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Reasons enough to release woody+1 not too late.
>
> Speaking of which, woody+1 sounds like it's going to be a release similar to
> link -- no huge changes to cause a prolongued release time.
So, the Debian Installer is already ready
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:49:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > > Between Apache 2.0 and KDE 3 releasing, I don't think we need Anthony
> > > to tell us that a Debian release is imminent :-P
> >
> > I heard something about a new release of Gnome coming out too. Gcc 3.1's
> > also due soon. W
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:30:17AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:56:55AM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Between Apache 2.0 and KDE 3 releasing, I don't think we need Anthony
> > to tell us that a Debian release is imminent :-P
>
> I heard something about a new releas
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 06:41:27PM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "we can tell that a Debian release is about to happen". Or
> > something.
> "I sense a disturbance in the force" ?
"As though millions of voices cried out, and ran apt-get."
Cheers,
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "we can tell that a Debian release is about to happen". Or
> something.
"I sense a disturbance in the force" ?
--
David N. Welton
Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/
Personal: http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Free Software: http://www.dedasys.
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 10:56:55AM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Between Apache 2.0 and KDE 3 releasing, I don't think we need Anthony
> to tell us that a Debian release is imminent :-P
I heard something about a new release of Gnome coming out too. Gcc 3.1's
also due soon. We're also a touch be
I just realized this might be ambigous -- what I meant was not that
"we shouldn't be about to release woody", but rather that
"we can tell that a Debian release is about to happen". Or something.
Maybe I should keep my mouth shut when running on too little sleep :)
Daniel
--
/---
Between Apache 2.0 and KDE 3 releasing, I don't think we need Anthony
to tell us that a Debian release is imminent :-P
Daniel
--
/ Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---\
| "Progress just means bad things happen faster." |
|
13 matches
Mail list logo
