On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:48:24PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > I don't think this configuration belongs to apt, I think it belongs to dpkg.
> I disagree, at least to a degree.
Me too.
>qemu-powerpc (or whatever it would
> be
Steve Langasek writes:
> Hi Goswin,
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> 4) Implementation (migration)
>
>> For most users activating multiarch would be a simple matter of
>> putting
>
>> Apt::Architectures {"amd64"; "i386";};
>
>> in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/mu
Hi Goswin,
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> So I decided to write an introduction to the problem that focuses more
> on the user side, why we want multiarch at all, what goals and
> requirements are to be met and gives some pointers.
Thanks for this. I'm no
Hector Oron writes:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the introduction.
>
> 2009/7/25 Goswin von Brederlow :
>> after listening to the "Multiarch round table" talk at Debconf I feel
>> that the talk was targeted at people already familiar with the subject
>> and jumped right in at full speed. Someone new to t
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after listening to the "Multiarch round table" talk at Debconf I feel
> that the talk was targeted at people already familiar with the subject
> and jumped right in at full speed. Someone new to the idea was
> probably
Hi,
Thanks for the introduction.
2009/7/25 Goswin von Brederlow :
> after listening to the "Multiarch round table" talk at Debconf I feel
> that the talk was targeted at people already familiar with the subject
> and jumped right in at full speed. Someone new to the idea was
> probably lost in th
6 matches
Mail list logo
