[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>But then again this may be overloading the package system since there
>are quite a few kernel modules...
But it would be nice with some standard way to specify a "depend" on a
kernel-option and a "provide" of options for kernel patches. I don't
know any way to c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 04:36:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>> 3) Where should this go? The obvious place is dpkg, but am I being too
>>arrogant there? It feels too small for its own package, though.
>
>I like the idea, but I think it should go in its own package, li
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 04:36:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> 3) Where should this go? The obvious place is dpkg, but am I being too
>arrogant there? It feels too small for its own package, though.
I like the idea, but I think it should go in its own package, like
menu. For one thing, a lot
3 matches
Mail list logo
