Re: [ITH] xmltex, passivetex, offer to take over jadetex

2007-04-25 Thread Frank Küster
OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Frank and all. > > # I'm reading debian-tex-maint. > > From: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [ITH] xmltex, passivetex, offer to take over jadetex > Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:46:15 +0200 > >> We offer to do the same with jadetex, if Ohura

Re: [ITH] xmltex, passivetex, offer to take over jadetex

2007-04-23 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Daniel Leidert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Am Montag, den 23.04.2007, 15:46 +0200 schrieb Frank K?ster: > > > in the last months or even years, xmltex and passivetex have been > > basically unmaintained (and they *do* have bugs), and responses from the > > list which is listed as maintainer are v

Re: [ITH] xmltex, passivetex, offer to take over jadetex

2007-04-23 Thread OHURA Makoto
Hi, Frank and all. # I'm reading debian-tex-maint. From: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [ITH] xmltex, passivetex, offer to take over jadetex Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:46:15 +0200 > We offer to do the same with jadetex, if Ohura thinks this is the way to > go. If you prefer to keep

Re: [ITH] xmltex, passivetex, offer to take over jadetex

2007-04-23 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Montag, den 23.04.2007, 15:46 +0200 schrieb Frank Küster: > in the last months or even years, xmltex and passivetex have been > basically unmaintained (and they *do* have bugs), and responses from the > list which is listed as maintainer are very rare. jadetex is actually > maintained by you,