Re: [ISSUE] No support for shadow groups, yet we perpetrate to have it

1999-10-01 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 07:44:38PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 01:28:53AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 06:53:18PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > This may sound silly, but in fact, glibc does not support shadow groups[1] > > > > Indeed. I think

Re: [ISSUE] No support for shadow groups, yet we perpetrate to have it

1999-10-01 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 01:28:53AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 06:53:18PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > This may sound silly, but in fact, glibc does not support shadow groups[1] > > Indeed. I think we can drop this idea altogether. How many people do use > passwords o

Re: [ISSUE] No support for shadow groups, yet we perpetrate to have it

1999-10-01 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 06:53:18PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > This may sound silly, but in fact, glibc does not support shadow groups[1] Indeed. I think we can drop this idea altogether. How many people do use passwords on groups anyway? thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian h