Re: *** POKED TIMER ***

2005-12-06 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005, Florian Weimer wrote: > Technically, the BIND code is wrong because pthread_cond_timedwait is What else is new... :( > not guaranteed to return within 15 seconds after the requested > timeout. But if this happens without extremely high load, something > fishy is going on. I

Re: *** POKED TIMER ***

2005-12-06 Thread Florian Weimer
* Marc Haber: > May I ask why you pollute the general development mailing list for > that? The comment in the code is: /* * This is a temporary (probably) hack to fix a bug on tru64 5.1 * and 5.1a. Sometimes, pthread_cond_timedwait() doesn't actually * return

Re: *** POKED TIMER ***

2005-12-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:50:05 +0100, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >With newer upgrade of bind9 I get the Message "*** POKED TIMER ***" in >the log several times. I'm not sure if this is a bug or just >logpolution. > >Do anybody know about this issue and why it happens? May I ask why you p