On 2017-12-20 4:06 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
have a new version number :)
Great! Thanks Art! I'll do an upload when it's available.
Ok, everything is set. Version 914 of all Citadel components is now
available from the main website, or from git master. My fleet of test
systems is not v
> We are one bugfix away from that release. Hoping to get it out over
> the
> next week or so.
>
> It will have a new version number :)
Great! Thanks Art! I'll do an upload when it's available.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Me
On 2017-12-12 4:00 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
Actually the problem is I run very low on time right now. Let me make
two things clear, I really like citadel despite not using it and
upstream (all of them, not just Art) is very nice to work with and more
than willing to help.
My problem is a very
[Removing the bugs crossposting.]
> > If you're interested, how about becoming a member of the team?
>
>Actually, I'm already listed as a member... (Robert Clay, 'jame-
> guest')
Oops, so have at it and fix the bugs. Just kidding, but thanks for
being part and helping.
Art, any idea when
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Robert,
>
>> If not I'm going to have it removed I guess.
>>
>> I'd be against that.
>
> Me too, but somebody has to be able to put some time into it. :)
>
>> I have a Jessie installed system that I can't update to Stretch
>> because ci
Robert,
> If not I'm going to have it removed I guess.
>
> I'd be against that.
Me too, but somebody has to be able to put some time into it. :)
> I have a Jessie installed system that I can't update to Stretch
> because citadel won't run on it yet; and the Citadel install there
> is
> one
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Art Cancro wrote:
>
> On 2017-12-11 7:42 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
>> Anyone interested in citadel/webcit?
I am, as I prefer to use the Debian packages for my systems. And
will do what I can in support of keeping it in Debian. (As well as
the other Citadel
Michael,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Anyone interested in citadel/webcit?
I am. (As well as the rest of the citadel packages of course.)
> If not I'm going to have it removed I guess.
I'd be against that.
I have a Jessie installed system that I can't update
> We patched some of the sources in an attempt to make it work on the
> latest Debian, but that effort seems to have missed the mark. That
> having been said, we've got everything working with both old and new
> libical versions now, and it seems to build cleanly on both previous
> and
> curre
> You can change the b-d to libical2-dev to still build with the old
> libical
> version. afaics it doesn't link with packages now linked with
> libical3.
Sorry, should have said that I was referring to libssl 1.0 vs 1.1
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes d
On 2017-12-11 7:42 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
Anyone interested in citadel/webcit? If not I'm going to have it removed I
guess.
There used to be a team maintaining these packages, but I'm the only one who
worked on it in recent years. Not having used the software myself I don't
really intend t
On 11.12.2017 13:42, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Anyone interested in citadel/webcit? If not I'm going to have it removed I
> guess.
>
> There used to be a team maintaining these packages, but I'm the only one who
> worked on it in recent years. Not having used the software myself I don't
> really in
Anyone interested in citadel/webcit? If not I'm going to have it removed I
guess.
There used to be a team maintaining these packages, but I'm the only one who
worked on it in recent years. Not having used the software myself I don't
really intend to spend more time on it and both packages have an
13 matches
Mail list logo
