user j...@debian.org
usertags 692614 + good-not-evil
usertags 692619 + good-not-evil
usertags 692624 + good-not-evil
usertags 692625 + good-not-evil
usertags 692627 + good-not-evil
usertags 692628 + good-not-evil
usertags 692629 + good-not-evil
usertags 692630 + good-not-evil
usertags 692631 + good
On 11/11/12 17:17, Michael Banck wrote:
> So how should we proceed? Is this dire enough that we need to repackage
> original tarballs, removing code under the JSON license? Or can we
> postpone this after the wheezy release and only patch out the offending
> code for now?
IANAL, but I believe th
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:25:51PM +0100, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
> Ansgar has recently made an MBF against all packages including the
> problematic JSON license term "The Software shall be used for Good, not
> Evil". From what I've seen, most - if not all - of the affected packages
> are
CCing Ansgar
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:25:51PM +0100, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
> Ansgar has recently made an MBF against all packages including the
> problematic JSON license term "The Software shall be used for Good, not
> Evil".
I've found one of these - #692614 - is the whole set collecte
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 07:13:45PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 8. November 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > As far as I can see Mr Crockford _enjoys_ being asked to change his
> > license. So no, please don't feed the troll.
>
> As much as I think this licence is stupid (from my free s
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 19:13, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 8. November 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > As far as I can see Mr Crockford _enjoys_ being asked to change his
> > license. So no, please don't feed the troll.
> As much as I think this licence is stupid (from my free software point of
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 8. November 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> As far as I can see Mr Crockford _enjoys_ being asked to change his
> license. So no, please don't feed the troll.
As much as I think this licence is stupid (from my free software point of
view), I don't think he should be called a troll,
* Leo 'costela' Antunes , 2012-11-08, 16:25:
Ansgar has recently made an MBF against all packages including the
problematic JSON license term "The Software shall be used for Good, not
Evil". From what I've seen, most - if not all - of the affected
packages are using in-source libraries copyrigh
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:25:51PM +0100, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ansgar has recently made an MBF against all packages including the
> problematic JSON license term "The Software shall be used for Good, not
> Evil". From what I've seen, most - if not all - of the affected packages
>
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:25:51PM +0100, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
> Should we maybe try again? As Ansgar
> mentioned in one bugreport, the license is considered non-free not only
> by us, but by Fedora as well[1] (and it's also notOSI-recognized)
FWIW, by FSF too: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/
Hi,
Ansgar has recently made an MBF against all packages including the
problematic JSON license term "The Software shall be used for Good, not
Evil". From what I've seen, most - if not all - of the affected packages
are using in-source libraries copyright JSON.org, which AFAIK means
convincing a s
11 matches
Mail list logo
