Mark Eichin wrote:
>xcompat is dead (ie. it dates from when those were valid... since no
>current packages need those virtual names, xcompat isn't needed either.)
I need xcompat to run Maple VR3.
--
Thomas Koenig, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The joy of engineering is to find a straight l
On 18 Jun 1997, Mark Eichin wrote:
> xcompat is dead (ie. it dates from when those were valid... since no
> current packages need those virtual names, xcompat isn't needed either.)
I was under the impression that xcompat is needed to run non-Debian
binaries that were compiled against old libs.
> I was under the impression that xcompat is needed to run non-Debian
> binaries that were compiled against old libs. I believe that may be true
That is possible (xcompat is an a.out library.) I haven't heard
direct reports of such (and xcompat is still dead -- there were never
"real" sources
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is a virtual package "imap-client" which is "suggested" by imap-4
> (Suggests: pine | imap-client) but no package seems to provide it. Thus, I
> suggest to remove this entry, too:
>
> imap-client
xcompat is dead (ie. it dates from when those were valid... since no
current packages need those virtual names, xcompat isn't needed either.)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi folks!
On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, Igor Grobman wrote (cf. bug #10676):
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 2.1.3.3
>
> X11R6 virtual package is not marked obsolete in virtual packages list. I
> got bitten by this one when packaging dotfile generator. I suspect
6 matches
Mail list logo
