Re: RFC: Splitting manpages into 2 packages

1997-06-05 Thread Ben Pfaff
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 3 Jun 1997, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > One package with misc/general manpages and another with development > > > manpages. What do you think? > > What would be the relative sizes of each? In theory I'm in favor. [...] > So, if yo

Re: RFC: Splitting manpages into 2 packages

1997-06-05 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
On 3 Jun 1997, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > One package with misc/general manpages and another with development > > manpages. What do you think? > What would be the relative sizes of each? In theory I'm in favor. It would be something like this: newton:~/src/deb/manpages-1.15$ du -c man{1,4,5,6,7,8}

RFC: Splitting manpages into 2 packages

1997-06-04 Thread Charles Briscoe-Smith
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One package with misc/general manpages and another with development >manpages. What do you think? I think that (at least) the "undocumented.?" pages should go in a separate package, or even back into the man-db package. I don't h

Re: RFC: Splitting manpages into 2 packages

1997-06-03 Thread Ben Pfaff
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One package with misc/general manpages and another with development > manpages. What do you think? What would be the relative sizes of each? In theory I'm in favor. -- Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12167 Airport Rd, DeWitt MI 4

RFC: Splitting manpages into 2 packages

1997-06-03 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
One package with misc/general manpages and another with development manpages. What do you think? -- Nicolás Lichtmaier.- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .