[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> Should I send you a photocopy of the original cdroms that I used to
> install on my system?
Actually, that can be useful, if only to verify just what version was
installed :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
The Fungi writes:
> Perhaps I'm missing something, but it seems to me that it would be more
> effective to try to get http://www.callwave.com/members/cancel/ bumped up
> to the top of the google search instead.
Now that sounds sensible.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
David Pashley writes:
> I'd hope that people actually clicked on the page in question rather
> than just seeing the email address in the summary on the google search.
We don't hear from those ones.
> But yes, I agree that some users are occasionally stupid or lazy or both.
Those we do hear from.
David Pashley wrote:
> John Hasler praised the llamas by saying:
> > And helping people get off C4LL W4VE is not our job.
>
> Surely we should do our best to help all computer users, not just Debian
> users. :)
It is not practical nor even possible to do so. The noise is
overwhelming!
I have a p
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:44:41PM +0100, David Pashley wrote:
[...]
> Even still, it's worth trying to get
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg01444.html bumped
> up to the top of the google search all the same.
[...]
Perhaps I'm missing something, but it seems to me that it would b
On Sep 05, 2005 at 18:33, John Hasler praised the llamas by saying:
> David Pashley writes:
> > No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on Google.
>
> If these people read the messages they find with their searches they
> wouldn't post here. They don't. They just grab the add
Just fix the program that generates our HTML mailing list archives, and
make it output for mails which
contain any of the Forbidden Words!
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key:
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | 0x888354F7
¯ '` ¯
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> I wonder if it would be possible to appeal to google to have them
> manually edit that search so that l.d.o doesn't appear. (Same for
> [replaced with "string instrument" to avoid another google hit]'s)
What I think I would rather see is targeted moderation of anything
David Pashley writes:
> No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on Google.
If these people read the messages they find with their searches they
wouldn't post here. They don't. They just grab the address and spam us.
And helping people get off C4LL W4VE is not our job.
> I b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Proulx wrote:
> David Pashley wrote:
>
>>> Don't follow up. Reply to them privately.
>>
>> No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on
>> Google.
>
>
> That is exactly the point. We DO NOT WANT people to find the
> Debian mailin
On Sep 05, 2005 at 18:14, Bob Proulx praised the llamas by saying:
> David Pashley wrote:
> > > Don't follow up. Reply to them privately.
> >
> > No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on Google.
>
> That is exactly the point. We DO NOT WANT people to find the Debian
> mail
David Pashley wrote:
> > Don't follow up. Reply to them privately.
>
> No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on Google.
That is exactly the point. We DO NOT WANT people to find the Debian
mailing lists in any relation to that search. Every time someone
references it in a
On Sep 05, 2005 at 17:13, John Hasler praised the llamas by saying:
> David Pashley writes:
> > I believe it is far more useful to follow up to these emails providing
> > useful information how to remove themselves and in particular link to the
> > rather informative email from Josh Metzler[0] so t
David Pashley writes:
> I believe it is far more useful to follow up to these emails providing
> useful information how to remove themselves and in particular link to the
> rather informative email from Josh Metzler[0] so that they might find out
> how to do it themselves rather than emailing the l
On Sep 05, 2005 at 16:31, John Hasler praised the llamas by saying:
> Please do not follow up to these messages. These idiots apparently Google
> the phrase and then spam all the addresses they find. Posting about the
> subject here just creates more hits.
I believe it is far more useful to foll
Please do not follow up to these messages. These idiots apparently Google
the phrase and then spam all the addresses they find. Posting about the
subject here just creates more hits.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
16 matches
Mail list logo
