Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:54:20PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
>> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Matthias Julius wrote:
>> >
>> >> I hate to reboot just to try out d-i. :-)
>> >
>> > Actually, you don't have to.
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:54:20PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Matthias Julius wrote:
> >
> >> I hate to reboot just to try out d-i. :-)
> >
> > Actually, you don't have to. Try qemu.
>
> Ahh, true. That's another chapter I
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Matthias Julius wrote:
>
>> I hate to reboot just to try out d-i. :-)
>
> Actually, you don't have to. Try qemu.
Ahh, true. That's another chapter I havn't looked into, yet.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just a thought, but how about booting d-i and familiarising yourself
> > with it? (This goes for all DDs who have never run d-i.)
>
> I hate to reboot just to try out d-i. :-)
Actually, you don't have to. T
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just a thought, but how about booting d-i and familiarising yourself
> with it? (This goes for all DDs who have never run d-i.)
I hate to reboot just to try out d-i. :-)
Now that etch is released I will actually do that. I have one machine
left that is no
Matthias Julius wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I suppose you haven't seen my previous mail. Note that this problem
> > (autodetecting 64-bit) is already solved in etch.
>
> True. I've read it after I wrot mine.
>
> Does d-i use syslinux?
Just a thought, but how about
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:00:45PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I suppose you haven't seen my previous mail. Note that this problem
> > (autodetecting 64-bit) is already solved in etch.
>
> True. I've read it after I wrot mine.
>
> Does d-i us
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suppose you haven't seen my previous mail. Note that this problem
> (autodetecting 64-bit) is already solved in etch.
True. I've read it after I wrot mine.
Does d-i use syslinux?
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:29:59PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:37:16PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> >> Does d-i need to run in 64bit mode to be able to install a amd64
> >> system?
> >
> > It needs a 64bit kernel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:37:16PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
>> Does d-i need to run in 64bit mode to be able to install a amd64
>> system?
>
> It needs a 64bit kernel to run 64bit binaries, and since many post
> installs run binaries, I would say
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 07:17:53PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> syslinux (3.31-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Including all *.c32 modules (Closes: #391152).
> * Added patch from Byron Stanoszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to autodetect 64bit
> CPUs (Closes: #408138).
>
> -- Daniel Baumann <[
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
>
> The multiarch media still has a small problem: for i386/amd64 they are
> no "fire and forget" thing; you still need to find out if you have an
> amd64 compatible system and start the amd64 boot process by hand.
>
> It would
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:37:16PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Does d-i need to run in 64bit mode to be able to install a amd64
> system?
It needs a 64bit kernel to run 64bit binaries, and since many post
installs run binaries, I would say yes it does.
You could probably isntall 32bit using a
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
>> The multiarch media still has a small problem: for i386/amd64 they are
>> no "fire and forget" thing; you still need to find out if you have an
>> amd64 compatible system an
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> The multiarch media still has a small problem: for i386/amd64 they are
> no "fire and forget" thing; you still need to find out if you have an
> amd64 compatible system and start the amd64 boot process by hand.
>
> It would be
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070409 10:00]:
>
> > > I think we should push the multi-arch media. Particularly, the
> > > x86/amd64/powerpc one can boot something like 99% of all the hardware
Hi!
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070409 10:00]:
> > I think we should push the multi-arch media. Particularly, the
> > x86/amd64/powerpc one can boot something like 99% of all the hardware
> > debian will ever run on, without the user having to care about what arch
> > his PC or Mac is, s
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070409 09:49]:
> I think we should push the multi-arch media. Particularly, the
> x86/amd64/powerpc one can boot something like 99% of all the hardware
> debian will ever run on, without the user having to care about what arch
> his PC or Mac is, since the media d
18 matches
Mail list logo
