Re: Proposal: Optional `Priority: optional` and changed `Section` fall-back

2024-12-31 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2024-12-15 at 09:27:06 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > Historically, if you omitted `Priority` and `Section` from your > package, `dpkg` would warn and use `-` or `unknown` as placeholder > when it absolutely needed a value for these fields in the `.dsc` and > the `.changes` file. The re

Re: Proposal: Optional `Priority: optional` and changed `Section` fall-back

2024-12-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, since feedback was requested the normally unwanted +1 ... Am Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 09:29:26AM + schrieb Holger Levsen: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 09:50:17AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > both sound good (dropping mandatory priority is nice and consistent, > > fixing unknown section behav

Re: Proposal: Optional `Priority: optional` and changed `Section` fall-back

2024-12-15 Thread Niels Thykier
Charles Plessy: Le Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 09:27:06AM +0100, Niels Thykier a écrit : We would like [...] that `dpkg` provides defaults [...] if the fields are omitted from `debian/control`, you get `Priority: optional` and `Section: unknown` as default in all artifacts (`.dsc`, `.changes`, and in t

Re: Proposal: Optional `Priority: optional` and changed `Section` fall-back

2024-12-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 09:27:06AM +0100, Niels Thykier a écrit : > We would like [...] that `dpkg` provides defaults [...] if the fields > are omitted from `debian/control`, you get `Priority: optional` and > `Section: unknown` as default in all artifacts (`.dsc`, `.changes`, > and in the `.deb`).

Re: Proposal: Optional `Priority: optional` and changed `Section` fall-back

2024-12-15 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 09:50:17AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > both sound good (dropping mandatory priority is nice and consistent, > fixing unknown section behaviour too), thanks! indeed! thank you both! > ideally these changes would be in dpkg in trixie, but maintainers would > start dropp

Re: Proposal: Optional `Priority: optional` and changed `Section` fall-back

2024-12-15 Thread Niels Thykier
Daniel Baumann: Hi, both sound good (dropping mandatory priority is nice and consistent, fixing unknown section behaviour too), thanks! Thanks for the feedback. :) ideally these changes would be in dpkg in trixie, but maintainers would start dropping priority fields *after* trixie so that f

Re: Proposal: Optional `Priority: optional` and changed `Section` fall-back

2024-12-15 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi, both sound good (dropping mandatory priority is nice and consistent, fixing unknown section behaviour too), thanks! ideally these changes would be in dpkg in trixie, but maintainers would start dropping priority fields *after* trixie so that for backports we woudn't need to add it back en mas

Proposal: Optional `Priority: optional` and changed `Section` fall-back

2024-12-15 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi, Historically, if you omitted `Priority` and `Section` from your package, `dpkg` would warn and use `-` or `unknown` as placeholder when it absolutely needed a value for these fields in the `.dsc` and the `.changes` file. The resulting `.deb` would omit the field. We would like to change this