Re: Proper way of closing *old* bugs

2006-04-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There's some debate over whether closing upstream bugs in the changelog is > OK, like so: > > * New upstream version. (Closes: #N) > - The bar is now frobbed correctly. (Closes: #X) > - No longer trip over our shoelaces. (Closes: #Y

Re: Proper way of closing *old* bugs

2006-04-10 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 05:55:05PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > My question is, is it now appropriate to use the changelog as a crutch > to close bugs that have nothing to do with the upload? No; however, in this case, the bugs *did* have something to do with the upload. > I was always under impres

Re: Proper way of closing *old* bugs

2006-04-10 Thread Cyril Bouthors
Adam, Here is what I meant, clearly: I took over the gnuplot package last week but I've only fixed 2 bugs out of 40. It's a shame because I'm supposed to handle them all when taking over the package and I did not. I'll do that as soon as possible but in the meanwhile, I've uploaded that package

Re: Proper way of closing *old* bugs

2006-04-09 Thread Cyril Bouthors
On 9 Apr 2006, Adam Majer wrote: > My question is, is it now appropriate to use the changelog as a > crutch to close bugs that have nothing to do with the upload? Adam, Apparently you still haven't understood my changelog nor my email: I haven't closed any bug that have nothing to do with the u

Re: Proper way of closing *old* bugs

2006-04-09 Thread Andreas Metzler
Stephen Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to me that, in this case (and correct me if I'm wrong), the > package hasn't been updated from upstream for a long time, and so the > difference between the old version and the new version fixes the stack > of old bugs (( even though it wasn't

Re: Proper way of closing *old* bugs

2006-04-08 Thread Stephen Samuel
It seems to me that, in this case (and correct me if I'm wrong), the package hasn't been updated from upstream for a long time, and so the difference between the old version and the new version fixes the stack of old bugs (( even though it wasn't _this specific version_ where the bug was fixed

Re: Proper way of closing *old* bugs

2006-04-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 05:55:05PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > Cyril Bouthors wrote: > > On 3 Apr 2006, Adam Majer wrote: > > > > > >> But the correct method of closing bugs is to send a message to > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the explanation of the fix and not in > >> the changelog. Well, at lea

Proper way of closing *old* bugs

2006-04-08 Thread Adam Majer
Hello everyone, I've written an email to Cyril Bouthors that started as, "In your 4.0.0-3 upload of gluplot, you've said in the changelog * This upload is aimed to take over the package and fix the easiest bugs first. I'll upload another version shortly that will take care of the oh-so-m