On 11293 March 1977, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> somewhere else etc. to map key fingerprints to Debian accounts. Add
> @debian.org
> and you get an email address (let's not care about people disabling
> it).
ANY "solution" *HAS* to care about this, there is no way you can sanely
think that [EMAIL P
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I suppose that most of the time you'll get lucky and one of the key
>> uids will match LDAP, but you still lose on DMs. And it's certainly
>> not required that one of the key uids matches anything in LDAP.
> I, on the contrary
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> Assuming the e-mail address on keys is mailable is also a bit dodgy,
>>> and which of the multiple identities on a key would one use?
>> The one that is stored associated to the account (DM or ldap and @d
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Assuming the e-mail address on keys is mailable is also a bit dodgy,
>> and which of the multiple identities on a key would one use?
> The one that is stored associated to the account (DM or ldap and @d.o).
I suppose that most
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Assuming the e-mail address on keys is mailable is also a bit dodgy, and
> which of the multiple identities on a key would one use?
The one that is stored associated to the account (DM or ldap and @d.o). It's not
that hard actually, after all, it has already been checked that
5 matches
Mail list logo
