Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 08.06.2012 15:28, maximilian attems wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:59:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> [Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list] >> >> Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed >> against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how >> /proc and /sys filesystem sh

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:59:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > [Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list] > > Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed > against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how > /proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs > when switching to new

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 08.06.2012 14:59, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] > Wonderful. > > I asked you nicely a) to stop reassigning without explanation, > and b) to provide some comments about why do you think it is > a busybox isue, at the same time providing my reasoning why > it is not. Ok. This was premature. Someho

Re: Processed: reassign 676001 to busybox

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
[Adding debian-devel@ to the Cc list] Short story (and it is short): the bug has been filed against initramfs-tools initially, it is about how /proc and /sys filesystem should be handled in initramfs when switching to new root. Original reporter included a trivial patch for initramfs that does re