Re: Prevent #568008 from being archived

2015-01-24 Thread Don Armstrong
found 568008 linux-2.6/3.1.8-2 found 568008 linux-2.6/3.0.0-3 found 568008 linux-2.6/2.6.32-5 fixed 568008 linux/3.2.21-1 found 568008 linux/3.16.0-4 submitter 568008 Patrick Häcker thanks On Sat, 24 Jan 2015, Patrick Häcker wrote: > I could not find the reason why #568008 got archived again. Cou

Re: Prevent #568008 from being archived

2015-01-24 Thread Patrick Häcker
On Saturday, 24. January 2015, 17:00:05 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > I did not read that bug report, but usually maintainers prefer to have > a new bug report (with a reference to the old bug) in the case of > regression. Ok, thanks a lot for the tips. I will do this next time. Patrick signature.a

Re: Prevent #568008 from being archived

2015-01-24 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Patrick Häcker wrote: > > I could not find the reason why #568008 got archived again. Could someone > please tell me what I have to do to avoid having it automatically archived in > its current state? > Or was it a mistake to reopen a bug when I assume there is a r

Prevent #568008 from being archived

2015-01-24 Thread Patrick Häcker
Hi, I could not find the reason why #568008 got archived again. Could someone please tell me what I have to do to avoid having it automatically archived in its current state? Or was it a mistake to reopen a bug when I assume there is a regression? Thanks in advance for enlighten me. Kind regar