found 568008 linux-2.6/3.1.8-2
found 568008 linux-2.6/3.0.0-3
found 568008 linux-2.6/2.6.32-5
fixed 568008 linux/3.2.21-1
found 568008 linux/3.16.0-4
submitter 568008 Patrick Häcker
thanks
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015, Patrick Häcker wrote:
> I could not find the reason why #568008 got archived again. Cou
On Saturday, 24. January 2015, 17:00:05 Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> I did not read that bug report, but usually maintainers prefer to have
> a new bug report (with a reference to the old bug) in the case of
> regression.
Ok, thanks a lot for the tips. I will do this next time.
Patrick
signature.a
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Patrick Häcker wrote:
>
> I could not find the reason why #568008 got archived again. Could someone
> please tell me what I have to do to avoid having it automatically archived in
> its current state?
> Or was it a mistake to reopen a bug when I assume there is a r
Hi,
I could not find the reason why #568008 got archived again. Could someone
please tell me what I have to do to avoid having it automatically archived in
its current state?
Or was it a mistake to reopen a bug when I assume there is a regression?
Thanks in advance for enlighten me.
Kind regar
4 matches
Mail list logo