Re: Possible mass filing of bugs: don't use libxaw-dev

2002-11-26 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:51:00PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > If you mean that these Build-Depend on pure virtual packages, then they > > should be changed. > > > > If they work with Xaw 7, they should B-D on libxaw7-dev | lixaw-dev. > > > > If they don't work with Xaw 7, they should B-D li

Re: Possible mass filing of bugs: don't use libxaw-dev

2002-11-25 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> If you mean that these Build-Depend on pure virtual packages, then they > should be changed. > > If they work with Xaw 7, they should B-D on libxaw7-dev | lixaw-dev. > > If they don't work with Xaw 7, they should B-D lixaw6-dev | libxaw-dev. Erm... if they don't work with xaw7, and you know it

Re: Possible mass filing of bugs: don't use libxaw-dev

2002-11-22 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 11:20:10PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:16:50PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > If you mean that these Build-Depend on pure virtual packages, then they > > should be changed. > > Why? Pure virtual dependencies are not incorrect. I am surprise

Re: Possible mass filing of bugs: don't use libxaw-dev

2002-11-22 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:16:50PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > If you mean that these Build-Depend on pure virtual packages, then they > should be changed. Why? Pure virtual dependencies are not incorrect. I am surprised to see that you still believe otherwise. > If they work with Xaw 7, the