Bastian Blank writes:
> What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then?
At present, I would expect that to run into file conflicts with
libc6. In the future, yes, that could be a problem without
appropriate Breaks: or Conflicts: declarations. :-/
One possible workaround coul
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:05:22AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
>
> > Goswin von Brederlow (03/08/2009):
> >> Does it break aptitude too?
> >
> > I think that people involved in serious things like multiarch and glibc
> > might appreciate your staying quiet at som
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:21:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bastian Blank writes:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:38:32AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> Bastian Blank a écrit :
> >> > What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then?
> >> > Forgot about that vari
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow (03/08/2009):
>> Does it break aptitude too?
>
> I think that people involved in serious things like multiarch and glibc
> might appreciate your staying quiet at some point given the quite huge
> mess you initially created. But maybe that's just me.
Goswin von Brederlow (03/08/2009):
> Does it break aptitude too?
I think that people involved in serious things like multiarch and glibc
might appreciate your staying quiet at some point given the quite huge
mess you initially created. But maybe that's just me.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Descri
Bastian Blank writes:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:38:32AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Bastian Blank a écrit :
>> > What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then?
>> > Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now.
>> If it is not the same major vers
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:38:32AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Bastian Blank a écrit :
> > What happens if someone install libc-bin without a new libc6 then?
> > Forgot about that variant before as it is not forbidden by deps now.
> If it is not the same major version, it will probably break, I'
Bastian Blank a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:02:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if
>> I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't
>> hesitate to test it on your machine.
>
> What happens if s
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:02:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I have finally decided to remove the Depends: line in libc-bin, even if
> I don't really like that. My tests show that it works now, but don't
> hesitate to test it on your machine.
What happens if someone install libc-bin without a
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-07-29 22:12 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> In short it looks like a Pre-Depends is overkill, and that a Depends is
> >> enough. I'll upload a new versio
10 matches
Mail list logo
