Hi Sam,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:36:37PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> Hi. You assert that even for leaf packages we should not make changes
> in unstable targeted beyond jessie. I can see an argument for that
> prior to the important bug deadline. However, past that point, I don't
> see val
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:08:38PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Unfortunately, it is equally disruptive when people (despite best
> efforts) misjudge the consequences of their upload. In such a case, you
> would be depriving your fellow co-Debianites from the opportunity of
> getting some patches
On 2014-12-04 08:46, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:42:54AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>> Le mercredi, 3 décembre 2014, 10.20:32 W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
>>> Would it be OK to abuse experimental for new upstreams during
>>> freeze?
>>
>> during freezes, where unstable s
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:00:38AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le jeudi, 4 décembre 2014, 07.46:25 Bart Martens a écrit :
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:42:54AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > > Le mercredi, 3 décembre 2014, 10.20:32 W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
> > > > Would it be O
Le jeudi, 4 décembre 2014, 07.46:25 Bart Martens a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:42:54AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > Le mercredi, 3 décembre 2014, 10.20:32 W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
> > > Would it be OK to abuse experimental for new upstreams during
> > > freeze?
> >
> > during
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:42:54AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le mercredi, 3 décembre 2014, 10.20:32 W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
> > Would it be OK to abuse experimental for new upstreams during
> > freeze?
>
> during freezes, where unstable should only have
> changes targeted at testin
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:39:48PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > > Hi. You assert that even for leaf packages we should not make changes
> > > in unstable targeted beyond jessie. I can see an argument for that
> > > prior to the important bug deadline. However, past that point, I don't
> > > see
Andrey,
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014, at 17:08, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:36:37PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > Didier> (Snipping others' parts, and moving to -devel)
> >
> > Didier> Given the (current) small exposure of
> > Didier> testing-proposed-updates (aka th
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:36:37PM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Didier> (Snipping others' parts, and moving to -devel)
>
> Didier> Given the (current) small exposure of
> Didier> testing-proposed-updates (aka the repository has very few
> Didier> users, therefore the packages there
On 03/12/14 15:36, Sam Hartman wrote:
> You assert that even for leaf packages we should not make changes
> in unstable targeted beyond jessie. I can see an argument for that
> prior to the important bug deadline. However, past that point, I don't
> see value in avoiding changes to leaf packages
> "Didier" == Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes:
Didier> (Snipping others' parts, and moving to -devel)
Didier> Given the (current) small exposure of
Didier> testing-proposed-updates (aka the repository has very few
Didier> users, therefore the packages there get very few testing),
(Moving to debian-devel, please followup there)
Le mercredi, 3 décembre 2014, 10.20:32 W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
> Would it be OK to abuse experimental for new upstreams during
> freeze? It is not the purpose of experimental to contain such
> packages, of course. But it might be a less harmful f
12 matches
Mail list logo
