Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems

Hi, On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:36:01PM +0300, Teodor wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry for asking a potentially stupid question, but how does the > > "Default-Start" keyword affect the bahvior of the system? > > Refer to http://wiki.de

Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for asking a potentially stupid question, but how does the > "Default-Start" keyword affect the bahvior of the system? Refer to http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts for details. Maybe this page should be updated

Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems

Hi Kel, On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:55:04PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > Just add the LSB header with correct information like: > > ### BEGIN INIT INFO > # Provides: athcool > # Required-Start:$remote_fs > # Required-Stop: $remote_fs > # Default-Start: 2 3 4

Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems

[Kel Modderman] > There is no need to modify README.Debian instructions, as insserv > package provides an update-rc.d wrapper. When the admin follows the > existing instructions of "update-rc.d athcool start 20 2 3 4 5 ." > you will get runlevel links, just that the sequence number 20 is > ignored

Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems (was: Release Update: freeze, architecture requalification)

Hi Nicolas, On Wednesday 23 July 2008 06:18:43 Nicolas Boullis wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Disclaimer: I've been pretty busy recently, not giving my Debian > > packages the care and love they deserve. That's why I'm now asking for > > help, somewhat late... > > > > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 03:35:35P

Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems (was: Release Update: freeze, architecture requalification)

Hi, As a follow-up to myself, and as suggested by Kel Modderman, please also CC replies to the developer list for initscripts-ng. (Full message kept for those people.) On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:33:10PM +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Hi, > > Disclaimer: I've been pretty busy recently, not gi

Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems (was: Release Update: freeze, architecture requalification)

Hi, Disclaimer: I've been pretty busy recently, not giving my Debian packages the care and love they deserve. That's why I'm now asking for help, somewhat late... On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 03:35:35PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > * Prepare init.d-Scripts for dependency-based init systems > > Wide