Re: Please do not use /run yet

2011-04-06 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:54:53 +0200, Roger Leigh wrote: > As of base-files 6.2 which went into unstable yesterday, we have a > new top-level directory, /run. > > This directory will contain a tmpfs which will be present from early > boot, and which will replace /var/run. This will be don

Re: Please do not use /run yet

2011-04-06 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 06.04.2011 15:50, schrieb Roger Leigh: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:54:53AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: >> I'm just mentioning this here because udev started to use /run before >> we had completed our work, and without a versioned dependency, causing >> breakage. If you are planning on using /run

Re: Please do not use /run yet

2011-04-06 Thread Roger Leigh
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:54:53AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > I'm just mentioning this here because udev started to use /run before > we had completed our work, and without a versioned dependency, causing > breakage. If you are planning on using /run, please hold fire for a > few days longer unti

Re: Please do not use /run yet

2011-04-06 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 04/06/2011 03:13 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 04/06/2011 04:54 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As of base-files 6.2 which went into unstable yesterday, we have a >> new top-level directory, /run. >> >> This directory will contain a tmpfs which will be present from early >> boot, and which

Re: Please do not use /run yet

2011-04-06 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 04/06/2011 04:54 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > Hi, > > As of base-files 6.2 which went into unstable yesterday, we have a > new top-level directory, /run. > > This directory will contain a tmpfs which will be present from early > boot, and which will replace /var/run. Why this change? Thomas --

Re: Please do not use /run yet

2011-04-06 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-04-06 13:12, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:18:32 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:54:53 (CEST), Roger Leigh wrote: As of base-files 6.2 which went into unstable yesterday, we hav

Re: Please do not use /run yet

2011-04-06 Thread Noel David Torres Taño
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:18:32 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:54:53 (CEST), Roger Leigh wrote: > > > As of base-files 6.2 which went into unstable yesterday, we have a > > > new top-level directory, /run. > > > > > > This directory will contain a tmpfs which will

Re: Please do not use /run yet

2011-04-06 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:18:32 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:54:53 (CEST), Roger Leigh wrote: > > > As of base-files 6.2 which went into unstable yesterday, we have a > > new top-level directory, /run. > > > > This directory will contain a tmpfs which will be prese

Re: Please do not use /run yet

2011-04-06 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:54:53 (CEST), Roger Leigh wrote: > As of base-files 6.2 which went into unstable yesterday, we have a > new top-level directory, /run. > > This directory will contain a tmpfs which will be present from early > boot, and which will replace /var/run. This will be done by

Please do not use /run yet

2011-04-06 Thread Roger Leigh
Hi, As of base-files 6.2 which went into unstable yesterday, we have a new top-level directory, /run. This directory will contain a tmpfs which will be present from early boot, and which will replace /var/run. This will be done by initscripts, which we are waiting to be uploaded. For the time b