Hi,
Matthias Urlichs writes:
>> Please respect our decision to stay away from systemd and still be
>> Debian users. If possible, please, don't resist changes that make our
>> lives easier.
>>
> *Sigh*.
>
> The problem is not that anybody resists such changes.
I disagree. People *do* in fact res
Hi,
Alexander Pushkin:
> It's core developers
*Its.
I think we can do without (quite unfounded, IMHO) insinuations that
systemd is somehow infected with an NSA-sponsored backdoor or two,
thank you very much.
> Please respect our decision to stay away from systemd and still be Debian
> users. I
Didier, Hello.
> The proper solution is to stop trying to hide ourselves from to the fact
> that some sort of systemd interfaces have been made unavoidable in
> modern desktop environments (fact which is rightfully reflected in our
> dependencies tree).
> Can we get over this now and start ma
Folks,
Le jeudi, 3 juillet 2014, 14.20:24 Juliusz Chroboczek a écrit :
> Isn't the proper solution to add blacklisting support to dpkg, then?
The proper solution is to stop trying to hide ourselves from to the fact
that some sort of systemd interfaces have been made unavoidable in
modern deskto
At Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:20:24 +0200,
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>
> > You have not yet explained why apt pinning is not enough.
>
> >>> Simply because apt is not the only way to install packages.
>
> >> Don't synaptic and/or whatever honor these pins too?
>
> > I have no idea about synaptic,
> You have not yet explained why apt pinning is not enough.
>>> Simply because apt is not the only way to install packages.
>> Don't synaptic and/or whatever honor these pins too?
> I have no idea about synaptic, but there’s e.g. cupt (which
> works as apt replacement, but probably (didn’t c
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>Thorsten Glaser:
>> >> You have not yet explained why apt pinning is not enough.
>> Simply because apt is not the only way to install packages.
>Don't synaptic and/or whatever honor these pins too?
I have no idea about synaptic, but there’s e.g. cupt (which
works as apt
Hi,
Thorsten Glaser:
> >> You have not yet explained why apt pinning is not enough.
>
> Simply because apt is not the only way to install packages.
>
Don't synaptic and/or whatever honor these pins too?
> Right. Furthermore, pinning can be used by the local admin,
> without namespacing pin prio
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> You have not yet explained why apt pinning is not enough.
Simply because apt is not the only way to install packages.
> - conflicting packages are honoured by dpkg, unlike pinning;
> - a package can conflict with multiple packages, whil
On Jo, 03 iul 14, 00:24:44, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > You have not yet explained why apt pinning is not enough.
>
> I'd appreciate an explanation too. I've inserted in my apt/preferences
> file the incantation given by Vitali F. (to whom thanks) at the very
> beginning of this thread, and it
Juliusz Chroboczek writes:
>> You have not yet explained why apt pinning is not enough.
>
> I'd appreciate an explanation too. I've inserted in my apt/preferences
> file the incantation given by Vitali F. (to whom thanks) at the very
> beginning of this thread, and it appears to have the requeste
> You have not yet explained why apt pinning is not enough.
I'd appreciate an explanation too. I've inserted in my apt/preferences
file the incantation given by Vitali F. (to whom thanks) at the very
beginning of this thread, and it appears to have the requested effect.
I've looked through the w
12 matches
Mail list logo
