Hi Rodrigo,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:21:12AM -0800, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> I do!
ah, nice to hear from you.
> I have been extremely remiss in my duties, and I have let ego keep
> me from accepting it.
>
> I have orphaned stunnel and all of my other packages. Feel free to
> NMU/take over as
On Friday, February 07, 2014 17:09:27 Ian Jackson wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes ("Re: Packaging of stunnel / MIA for Luis Rodrigo
> Gallardo Cruz"): ...
>
> > Well, here's the typical scenario:
> >- maintainer stops maintaining a package, for whatever rea
Chris Knadle writes ("Re: Packaging of stunnel / MIA for Luis Rodrigo Gallardo
Cruz"):
...
> Well, here's the typical scenario:
>
>- maintainer stops maintaining a package, for whatever reason,
> and doesn't respond to communication... for a long ti
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:56:04PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> I know; I agree with you and I think the text is a bit misleading -- by
> stating that you shouldn't change the packaging style it seems to indicate
> that NMUs are supposed to be minimalistic, but a situation in which the
> maintai
Leaving off the MIA team on this reply, mainly because I don't think this is
"news" to them per se and I'd rather not "spam" them.
On Friday, February 07, 2014 02:54:09 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:56:04PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > I know; I agree with you and I thin
Adding Gregor Herrmann to this because he and I were looking to work on
#672198 but we both were swamped with other work.
On Friday, February 07, 2014 00:02:16 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 03:27:51PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 06, 2014 13:59:59 Seba
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 03:27:51PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Thursday, February 06, 2014 13:59:59 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> [...]
>
> NMUs don't necessarily need to be minimalistic -- for instance packaging new
> versions is something that can be done with NMUs. This is admittedly not
> t
On Thursday, February 06, 2014 13:59:59 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There have been multiple new upstream releases for stunnel4 and the
> package has gathered quite some bugs without any feedback from its
> maintainer. Looking at Rodrigo's QA page [0] his last actions were
> quite some time
Hi,
There have been multiple new upstream releases for stunnel4 and the
package has gathered quite some bugs without any feedback from its
maintainer. Looking at Rodrigo's QA page [0] his last actions were
quite some time ago (2012) and most packages would have gathered RC
bugs without the help of
9 matches
Mail list logo
