Re: Orphaning most of my packages

2006-10-13 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 01:02:49AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Steve Greenland wrote: > > Bug#392672: O: positron - synchronization manager for the Neuros Audio > > Computer Python. Probably dead after v1.1. Pierre Habouzit has NMU'd a > > version 1.1 upgrade and support for new python polic

Re: Orphaning most of my packages

2006-10-12 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Steve Greenland wrote: > Bug#392672: O: positron - synchronization manager for the Neuros Audio > Computer Python. Probably dead after v1.1. Pierre Habouzit has NMU'd a > version 1.1 upgrade and support for new python policy, see bug # 380895. I can confirm that Positron is dead. Not only is it dea

Re: Orphaning most of my packages

2006-10-12 Thread Jan C. Nordholz
Hi, > Bug#392665: O: nvi - 4.4BSD re-implementation of vi I'll take nvi if no one objects. Regards, Jan signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Orphaning most of my packages

2006-10-12 Thread Steve Greenland
The time is long since past to admit that I will *never* again have the time to provide proper maintenance to my packages. Given the brief delay in the freeze, hopefully someone can pick these up and get new versions in with proper maintainers. I don't have time to provide sponsorship either; I w

Re: orphaning most (of my) packages

2002-08-22 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Kyle McMartin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:57:39AM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote: > > Too late :/ > > > Has kernel-patch-int been adopted? As one of the upstream authors I > would be glad to take it over. I have agreed with Ivo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), that he can t

Re: orphaning most (of my) packages

2002-08-22 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:57:39AM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote: > Too late :/ > Has kernel-patch-int been adopted? As one of the upstream authors I would be glad to take it over. Regards, Kyle -- Kyle McMartin pgpkJ92sIv4YC.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: orphaning most (of my) packages

2002-08-22 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Thorsten Sauter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > libphp-adodb (a php database abstraction layer, required for 'acidlab') > > I'll like to adopte the libphp-adodb package from you. Too late :/ Greets, Robert -- ( o> Linux Generation pgp

Re: orphaning most (of my) packages

2002-08-22 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Mako Hill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > razor ('needed' by spamasassin; needs updating) > > I've check out the bug list and the package and I'd like to take this > on unless some more qualified wants it. Taken - sorry ! :) Greets, Robert -- ( o> Linux

Re: orphaning most (of my) packages

2002-08-22 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:43:52PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote: > Robert van der Meulen wrote: > > kernel-patch-int (should be superseded by cryptoapi; i can't find the time). > > > > Then there's some ITP's i (enthousiastically) did; i'm going to be closing > > them too. Interested people can upl

Re: orphaning most (of my) packages

2002-08-21 Thread Thorsten Sauter
Hello, > libphp-adodb (a php database abstraction layer, required for 'acidlab') I'll like to adopte the libphp-adodb package from you. I have created the packages with the new upstream version. You can download it from: ftp://jade.viastore.de/debian/pool/main/libp/libphp-adodb/ All cur

Re: orphaning most (of my) packages

2002-08-21 Thread Mako Hill
> razor ('needed' by spamasassin; needs updating) I've check out the bug list and the package and I'd like to take this on unless some more qualified wants it. -- B. Mako Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~mako/ pgpMmajL0klnq.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: orphaning most (of my) packages

2002-08-21 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Ivo Timmermans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I would like to take over your ITP for cryptoapi. If noone else wants > it, I can take kernel-patch-int too. As discussed yesterday night; they're yours. Greets, Robert -- ( o> Linux Generation

Re: orphaning most (of my) packages

2002-08-21 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Peter Palfrader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Please retitle them to RFP (request for package) rather than closing > them if you still think they'ld make a worthwhile addition to Debian. Thanks, good point :) Greets, Robert -- ( o> Linux Generation

Re: orphaning most (of my) packages

2002-08-20 Thread Ivo Timmermans
Robert van der Meulen wrote: > kernel-patch-int (should be superseded by cryptoapi; i can't find the time). > > Then there's some ITP's i (enthousiastically) did; i'm going to be closing > them too. Interested people can upload and close at will, if they're faster > than me: ricochet, loop-aes, cr

Re: orphaning most (of my) packages

2002-08-20 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Robert van der Meulen wrote: > Then there's some ITP's i (enthousiastically) did; i'm going to be closing > them too. Interested people can upload and close at will, if they're faster > than me: ricochet, loop-aes, cryptoapi, ipsec-tunnel. Please retitle them to RFP (request

orphaning most (of my) packages

2002-08-20 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Hi, I'm going to orphan most of my packages. Before I upload them with Maintainer: set to QA, i'd like people to look at them and see if they want anything :) Some of the - less intensive - packages I'm keeping, the others I can't keep on maintaining due to several reasons (bought a house, plan to