Description : Extract OpenOffice 1.x spreadsheet data
The module parses OpenOffice 1.x spreadsheet files (.sxc) and returns Perl
data structure to access its values.
The package is a dependency of libspreadsheet-read-perl, but is silently
ignored if not used.
I plan to team-maintain the package in
-2+
Programming Lang: Java
Description : OpenOffice plugin for JabRef
This plugin offers an interface for inserting citations and
formatting a Bibliography in an OpenOffice writer document from
JabRef.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLm8J
: BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A module for reading/writing Excel and OpenOffice Calc files
pyExcelerator is a Python module that can generate Excel 97/2000/XP/2003 and
OpenOffice Calc files. It can also extract data from these files. It supports
Unicode in Excel files, a
Hi,
Alejandro R?os P. wrote:
> "Alejandro (in case you read that in the buglog since your ??%&??
> mailserver doesn't accept mail)..."
Well, it's not personal. It just the mailserver not accepting mail
and that makes problems for reaching you (as in case for this ITP).
As mail is to debian commun
Hello.
I've talk to Stuart since a lot time ago about all this, but forgot to
look over his late work on the fonts part that was missing. I tough that
was a little bit more delyaed than it is. That is my fault for not
checking and I'm sorry.
Now I will test the fonts against my op-panel package,
Hi Stuart,
El mar, 08-08-2006 a las 08:11 -0400, Stuart Anderson escribió:
>
> I already have package for these fonts prepared as part of the ming
> sounrce package, and am awaiting some feedback from some of the
> packages
> that will use them. Feedback from others would be welcome as well.
>
>
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
No, Replaces:/Povides:/Conflicts: libming-...
^^^
important, because woody's package is named
like that. for packages not yet in the archive
(your ming-* you can do that but
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Would it be possible to convert them at installation time?
Yes, it would be possible.
There would be two essential options:
1. creation at installation time:
- possibly only one package for all ming fonts (the tool)
The tool is currently provide
Am Dienstag 08 August 2006 14:47 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> Yes, the packages I have prepared are built as part of the rest of the
> ming package. The ming source package Build-depends on the package that
> contains the TTF fonts that will be converted into a libming font package.
> Upstream ming (
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 15:32 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> So this should cover it?
>
> Package: ming-fonts-opensymbol
> Conflicts: ming-fonts-openoffice
> Replaces: ming-fonts-openoffice
> Provides: ming-fonts-openoffice
No, Replaces:/Povides:/
s" name...
So this should cover it?
Package: ming-fonts-opensymbol
Conflicts: ming-fonts-openoffice
Replaces: ming-fonts-openoffice
Provides: ming-fonts-openoffice
Interestingly, the ttf-opensymbol package places the font in the
openoffice directory.
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ope
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 15:10 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> > OK. Now, I fetched your -openoffice pakcage and saw that (as I guessed) it
> > just does OpenSymbol. Can you please name it -opensymbol (to show that it
> > is the
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
OK. Now, I fetched your -openoffice pakcage and saw that (as I guessed) it
just does OpenSymbol. Can you please name it -opensymbol (to show that it
is the opensymbol font from ttf-opensymbol) then?
Yes, that would be a better naming scheme. I was a
close 381992
thanks
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:11 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> >> * Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
> >> Version
pstream ming (and the libming-util package) now includes an updated version
> of the tool that is used to convert the fonts.
OK. Now, I fetched your -openoffice pakcage and saw that (as I guessed) it just
does OpenSymbol. Can you please name it -opensymbol (to show that it is the
opensymbo
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Are those fonts manually converted?
YOu didn't answer his question.
Fair enough. The coffee hadn't quite kicked in yet. 8-)
Are they manually converted? Or how are they converted?
I wasn't sure what Alejandro had in mind, so I didn't want
to ans
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:13 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>
> > Are those fonts manually converted? If not, wouldn't it be better to convert
> > them as needed instead of yet-another-incompatible-font-package?
>
> The long term plan is for libmin
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Are those fonts manually converted? If not, wouldn't it be better to convert
them as needed instead of yet-another-incompatible-font-package?
The long term plan is for libming to be able to read in TTF fonts directly,
but that's not there yet.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
* Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org
* URL : http://www.openoffice.org/
* License : GPL
Description
Am Dienstag 08 August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Alejandro Rios P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : OpenO
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> * Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org
> * URL : http://www.openoffice.org/
> * License : GPL
> Description : Fonts for
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 08.08.2006, 02:28 -0500 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> .These fonts canNOT be used with X11 or for printing.
I suggest writing this as 'can NOT'. It's easier to parse and (with the
idea of descriptions' translations in mind) comes closer to what happens
in a translation -- at
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Alejandro Rios P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org
* URL : http://www.openoffice.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Fo
[Alejandro Bonilla]
> Will OpenOffice2 hit Sid anytime soon? Is there anything to do to
> help to get it in?
It is waiting in NEW at the moment, so as soon as the ftpmasters had a
look at it, I expect it to go into sid.
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html>.
I'm sure the OOo-maintainers want mor
Hi,
Will OpenOffice2 hit Sid anytime soon? Is there anything to do to help to get
it in?
.Alejandro
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi ..
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 06:02:46PM +0530, Guntupalli Karunakar wrote:
> Are there any .debs available for openoffice 1.1 beta? Has nyone made
>them?
>package list in unstable/editors has openoffice 1.0.3 only.
Have a look at experimantel ... ;)
Jan
--
.&#
Hi,
Are there any .debs available for openoffice 1.1 beta? Has nyone made
them?
package list in unstable/editors has openoffice 1.0.3 only.
Regards,
Karunakar
--
A Reasonable man adapts himself to the world
An Unreasonable man tries to adapt the world to himself
So all progress in the world
Why is OpenOffice in the "Other" menu in Gnome (2.2) instead of in the
"Office" menu where it should be?
--
.''`. Carl B. Constantine
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'GnuPG: 135F FC30 7A02 B0EB 61DB 34E3 3AF1 DC6C 9F7A 3FF8
`-
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:19:07PM -0500, "H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > So much for write-once, run-anywhere.
>
> Did anyone ever believe that?
Yup, management ;-(
--
Olaf MeeuwissenEPSON KOWA
it would
help the status of OpenOffice at all, but it would lend a bit of
credence to the "write-once, run-anywhere" claims.
noah
--
___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html
pg
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:19:07PM -0500, "H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> So much for write-once, run-anywhere.
Did anyone ever believe that?
Daniel
--
/ Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---\
| Gil-Galad was a
On Tuesday 10 Dec 2002 8:06 pm, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:40:12PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:13:13PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > Secondly, since OpenOffice seems to be GPL'd, I am wondering why it is
> >
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:38:19PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:06:10PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[snip]
> > Excuse me for butting in here, but aren't there GPL'd Java compilers in
> > main already? Or does OpenOffice require a non-DFSG Java c
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:06:10PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:40:12PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:13:13PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > Secondly, since OpenOffice seems to be GPL'd, I am wondering why it is in
&
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:40:12PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:13:13PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > Secondly, since OpenOffice seems to be GPL'd, I am wondering why it is in
> > contrib instead of main.
>
> Build-dependency on Java.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:13:13PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Secondly, since OpenOffice seems to be GPL'd, I am wondering why it is in
> contrib instead of main.
Build-dependency on Java.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpFXNEPXKUPh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
f contrib is not now the default and has no
business being the default because it is NOT part of Debian.
Secondly, since OpenOffice seems to be GPL'd, I am wondering why it is in
contrib instead of main.
Finally, I think it imprudent to use a single package as a test for whether
or not to include
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: myspanish (or openoffice.org-spellcheck-es-es)
* License : (GPL)
Description : The myspell spanish dictionary for openoffice
This is simply a reservation to notify that I plan to prepare a
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:07:31PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
>What exactly is the situation with regard to openoffice going into
>debian sid? I ask because OpenOffice 641C seems quite robust now (I've
>been doing some statistical data analysis in it this weekend and it
Hello,
What exactly is the situation with regard to openoffice going
into debian sid? I ask because OpenOffice 641C seems quite robust
now (I've been doing some statistical data analysis in it this
weekend and it works as well as Excel). The only current problem I
see in it is that th
40 matches
Mail list logo
