retitle 825062 ITP -- Tk HTML widget
thanks
I should not re-use the old mail as a template :-)
Just to add: I intend to put both packages under the hood of the TclTk
team, using its git repository:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-tcltk/packages/tkmpeg.git
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-tc
Package: wnpp
Owner: Balint Reczey
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: kerneloops
Version : 0.12+git20140509-1
Upstream Author : Arjan van de Ven
* URL : https://github.com/oops-kernel-org/kerneloops
* License : GPL
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> My trick to get extra copies of direct replies to my own mails in
> mailing lists (I place such copies into a dedicated folder) is to keep
> a local cache of Message-IDs of my own sent messages and then check
> In-Reply-To: header in the
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:44:07AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 13/03/11 08:19, Ben Finney wrote:
> >Shachar Shemesh writes:
> >>I am subscribed to lots and lots of mailing lists. All mail from those
> >>lists gets automatically delivered to dedicated folders automatically.
> >>This
Hello Carsten Hey,
Am 2011-03-12 10:50:03, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> If a message I reply to contains a Mail-Followup-To: set, I use it. If
> not, I guess if the person I reply to wants to receive a reply. To
> prevent me to Cc: you, you need to explicitly set Mail-Followup-To: to
> the
Hello Shachar Shemesh,
Am 2011-03-13 19:54:01, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> If I set "reply-to" to myself, the mail won't go to the list. If I
> set it to the list, it won't go to me. Either way, the desired
> effect isn't achieved.
>
> Also, reply-to is the wrong tool for this job (this is
On 13/03/11 20:55, Andrei Popescu wrote:
At least with mutt I distinctively recall it replied both to the list
and CCd the poster on list-reply.
That is a specific Mutt work around for broken lists that add "reply-to"
automatically. It is not generally available.
Not sure about other mailers
On Du, 13 mar 11, 19:54:01, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 13/03/11 11:29, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> >>Any suggestions on how to do it?
> >By setting 'Reply-To:' appropriately, this is what it's for.
> If I set "reply-to" to myself, the mail won't go to the list. If I
> set it to the list, it won't
On 13/03/11 11:29, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Any suggestions on how to do it?
By setting 'Reply-To:' appropriately, this is what it's for.
If I set "reply-to" to myself, the mail won't go to the list. If I set
it to the list, it won't go to me. Either way, the desired effect isn't
achi
On Du, 13 mar 11, 10:44:07, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 13/03/11 08:19, Ben Finney wrote:
> >If you like to get two copies, why can't you arrange to generate the
> >extra copies you want without involving anyone else's configuration?
> Any suggestions on how to do it?
By setting 'Reply-To:' appro
Le samedi 12 mars 2011 à 10:50 +0100, Carsten Hey a écrit :
> I set Mail-Followup-To: on every mail I send to *@lists.debian.org.
> Most DDs just ignore it (though there are some exceptions) and this
> renders using Mail-Followup-To: to get a copy to be rather useless.
Maybe this is because Mail-
On 13/03/11 08:19, Ben Finney wrote:
Shachar Shemesh writes:
Personally, I think the code of conduct should be amended, along with
the list software.
While this shouldn't turn into a counting of popularity, I'd like to
register that there are people who think the list behaviour cur
Shachar Shemesh writes:
> Personally, I think the code of conduct should be amended, along with
> the list software.
While this shouldn't turn into a counting of popularity, I'd like to
register that there are people who think the list behaviour currently
(leave the Reply-To field untouched) is
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:57:29PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
[...]
> How should new people know that they don't get a copy of replies
> to their messages unless they explicitly request one?
Maybe it's a generational difference... as I expect did authors of
the code of conduct, I came up on bulleti
* Carsten Hey [2011-03-12 10:50 +0100]:
> There are examples where we lost potential future maintainers because
> they never received a reply to an RFS. These replies were sent to the
> list, but they were not sent to those requesting sponsorship.
To clarify this: the problem was not that Mail-Fo
* jida...@jidanni.org [2011-03-12 11:14 +0800]:
> Recently I replied to a certain message on this list with my familiar
> S W runs the command gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
> keystrokes, only to receive
>
> >I'm subscribed to the list, no need to CC me:
> >http://www.debian.org/MailingLis
On 12/03/11 05:14, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Therefore perhaps
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
could be amended to mention that adding a Mail-Followup-To header might
add an additional wall of defense for those who wish to cut down even
further the possibility they might recei
Recently I replied to a certain message on this list with my familiar
S W runs the command gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
keystrokes, only to receive
>I'm subscribed to the list, no need to CC me:
>http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
>No need to reply to this message.
And i
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2010-11-22, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> The release notes usually recommend to have the latest stable packages
>> before proceeding with the upgrade.
>
> Are they?
They did:
| 4.2 Checking system status
[...]
| This procedure also assumes your system has been updated t
* Steve M. Robbins , 2010-11-22, 01:08:
I just received notice (bug 603579) that upgrade lenny to squeeze will
break if a boost package containing an "rtupdate" script is installed.
In stable there are four such packages:
libboost-python-dev
libboost-dbg
libboost-python1.35-dev
libboost1.35
On 11/22/2010 11:11 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2010-11-22, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>>> The rtupdate script has since been changed (in unstable) to avoid this
>>> problem, but I'm not sure what can be done for stable users other than
>>> recommending
On 2010-11-22, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>> The rtupdate script has since been changed (in unstable) to avoid this
>> problem, but I'm not sure what can be done for stable users other than
>> recommending to purge the above four packages prior to upgrade
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> The rtupdate script has since been changed (in unstable) to avoid this
> problem, but I'm not sure what can be done for stable users other than
> recommending to purge the above four packages prior to upgrade. Is
> there any way to do this automa
Hi,
I just received notice (bug 603579) that upgrade lenny to squeeze will
break if a boost package containing an "rtupdate" script is installed.
In stable there are four such packages:
libboost-python-dev
libboost-dbg
libboost-python1.35-dev
libboost1.35-dbg
The issue is that the rtupd
That's userlinux.com . I don't have the .org, some domain squatter has
that.
Thanks
Bruce
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:04:31PM +, bruce wrote:
> I did a first pass at the UserLinux white paper, it's at
> http://userlinux.org/white_paper.html. I think I'll sleep for a while.
>
Mistakenly sent to debian-devel. This is off topic.
Merry Xmas to you all!!
Cheers,
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
> "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jules> Dear overworked gtk maintainer... Did you deliberately
Jules> upload a version 1.1.14 of gtk1.1.13? Looks confused to
Jules> me..
It was deliberate, but it was a mistake. The GTK+ maintainers told
me 1.1.14 was binary co
Jules Bean wrote:
>
> On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote:
> >
> > > Dear overworked gtk maintainer...
> > >
> > > Did you deliberately upload a version 1.1.14 of gtk1.1.13? Looks confused
> > > to me..
> >
> > Doh!
> >
> > I'll shut up now.
> >
> >
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > Dear overworked gtk maintainer...
> >
> > Did you deliberately upload a version 1.1.14 of gtk1.1.13? Looks confused
> > to me..
>
> Doh!
>
> I'll shut up now.
>
> Lesson - read the changelog..
Going for th
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote:
> Dear overworked gtk maintainer...
>
> Did you deliberately upload a version 1.1.14 of gtk1.1.13? Looks confused
> to me..
Doh!
I'll shut up now.
Lesson - read the changelog..
Jules
/+---+---
Dear overworked gtk maintainer...
Did you deliberately upload a version 1.1.14 of gtk1.1.13? Looks confused
to me..
Jules
/+---+-\
| Jelibean aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6 Evelyn Rd|
| Jules aka | [EMAIL
Sorry for the last one. Should have gone to request. But I'm in a hurry. My
boss decided to strip my remote login rights without telling me. Boy, am I
glad I leave this company!
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Eu
Sorry, I was having hassles with my local mail system & broken reverse
DNS here and accidentally resent an unstable upload announcement
to debian-devel-announce instead of debian-devel-changes.
:-(
hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Debian p
Package: (bootdisk)
Version: 1996_6_16
APM support is enabled in the 2.0 kernel on this bootdisk. Some
"green" motherboards have problems with this, resulting in kernel
oops every time during kernel startup (before mounting the root
filesystem). Turning off power management in
34 matches
Mail list logo
