Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-26 Thread Neil McGovern
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:08:53PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > As mentioned in the last mail we sent to d-d-a (and several at > various points before that) if you have serious concerns that > important updates to your package won't be included in the release, > the correct approach is to talk t

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:19:43 +0200 marcel partap wrote: > [ > > net effect of the above is more likely to be that the urgency will be > > overriden on the britney side > ... ?hmm? debian has a britney side? long blondish hair, well curved? > niccce - *niie*--- :D > *cough* freezes suck^^^ ] >

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Adam D. Barratt writes ("On the (ab)use of the Urgency field"): > I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on > it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of > the Urgency field: > >* Urgency high to beat t

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread marcel partap
[ > net effect of the above is more likely to be that the urgency will be > overriden on the britney side ... ?hmm? debian has a britney side? long blondish hair, well curved? niccce - *niie*--- :D *cough* freezes suck^^^ ] #hacky day folks ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...

On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of the Urgency field: * Urgency high to beat the freeze. As mentioned in the last mail we sent to d-d-a (and several at various points before that)