On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:17:50 -0600, John Goerzen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Besides, NNTP is better-suited for it, and BTW is already available at
>www.gmane.org.
If we start referring people to GMANE, we should drop them a load of
older list archives for import. They only started in mid-2002.
G
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:12:57AM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:52:50PM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> > I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) access to the lists? It
> > recently occured to me that that would be a Nice Feature(tm), or do I
> > have a flaw in t
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 06:20:18PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) access to the lists?
> > It recently occured to me that that would be a Nice Feature(tm), or
> > do I have a flaw in that idea?
>
> I think IMAP on large mailboxes could be quite res
Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 12 December 2003 01:14, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> If you're looking for an up-to-the-minute archive of Debian
>> lists, check out the nntp server at gmane.org. Visit
>> www.gmane.org for details.
> I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) acc
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:52:50PM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) access to the lists? It
> recently occured to me that that would be a Nice Feature(tm), or do I
> have a flaw in that idea?
No real reason for this. Just grab the compressed mbox once
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 12 December 2003 01:14, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> If you're looking for an up-to-the-minute archive of Debian
> lists, check out the nntp server at gmane.org. Visit
> www.gmane.org for details.
I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) access
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 06:37:57PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> It isn't just debian-boot; none of the lists I checked at random have
> been updated past that date and time. No responses have been logged in
> the audit trail either, which for an 'important' severity is disturbing.
>
> listarchive
Phil Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It isn't just debian-boot; none of the lists I checked at random have
> been updated past that date and time. No responses have been logged in
> the audit trail either, which for an 'important' severity is disturbing.
If you're looking for an up-to-the-
It isn't just debian-boot; none of the lists I checked at random have
been updated past that date and time. No responses have been logged in
the audit trail either, which for an 'important' severity is disturbing.
listarchives maintainers, hello? Can we get some kind of response, just
to let us
9 matches
Mail list logo
