[Steve Langasek]
> sysvinit is also an Essential package. What steps are you taking to ensure
> that you've retained the proper semantics for Essential? Such changes
> should be backed with more than just an apt upgrade test, because an apt
> upgrade where everything /works/ may not be the case
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:09:55AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> To prepare for the async boot system upstart currently in
> experimental, the sysvinit source package maintainers have decided to
> split out a few programs from the sysvinit binary package. The new
> sysvinit-utils package wi
To prepare for the async boot system upstart currently in
experimental, the sysvinit source package maintainers have decided to
split out a few programs from the sysvinit binary package. The new
sysvinit-utils package will be a dependency of upstart, and the old
sysvinit package is a conflict. T
3 matches
Mail list logo